Kansas Transition Assessment Tools: What the IEP Team Should Use

Why Assessments Come First

Kansas administrative rules require age-appropriate transition assessments before the IEP team writes measurable postsecondary goals. This is not a formality — the assessments are supposed to produce data that drives the goals. A postsecondary employment goal that says "will obtain competitive employment in food service" should be traceable to assessment results showing the student's interests, strengths, and functional capabilities in that area.

When transition plans feel generic — the same template goals pasted into every IEP — the root cause is usually weak or absent assessment data. If the team writes goals first and then back-fills an assessment, the goals reflect the team's assumptions, not the student's actual profile.

Types of Transition Assessments Kansas Accepts

Kansas does not mandate a specific instrument. KSDE and the federal Indicator 13 framework require that assessments be "age-appropriate" and cover the three transition domains: education/training, employment, and independent living (when the team determines it is relevant). That leaves room for a range of approaches:

Formal instruments provide standardized, scored results. Common tools include the Transition Planning Inventory (TPI), which surveys the student, parent, and school staff across 46 competencies; the AAIDD Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale (DABS) for students with intellectual disabilities; and self-determination assessments like the AIR Self-Determination Scale.

Informal assessments capture preferences and interests without standardized scoring. These include student interviews, interest inventories (like O*NET Interest Profiler or the iTransition tool developed by Families Together and KSDE), situational assessments in community work settings, and teacher/parent observation checklists.

Functional vocational evaluations are the most intensive option. These assess the student's actual work behaviors, task completion, and vocational aptitude in structured settings — either a simulated work environment or a community-based placement. Functional vocational evaluations become increasingly valuable at age 16 and beyond, when the IEP must include a coordinated set of activities with specific transition services.

What Good Assessment Data Looks Like

Assessment data should answer specific questions, not produce vague descriptions:

For the employment goal: What types of work environments match the student's sensory and social profile? What task complexity can the student manage independently? What supports (visual schedules, job coaching, assistive technology) would the student need in a competitive integrated employment setting?

For the education/training goal: Does the student have the academic preparation for postsecondary education? If pursuing college, what accommodations are documented and what clinical documentation will the disability services office require? If pursuing a certificate program or trade training, what foundational skills are in place?

For the independent living goal (when included): Can the student manage daily living tasks — meal preparation, personal hygiene, transportation, basic budgeting — and at what level of independence? What instruction or assistive technology would close remaining gaps?

The Assessment-to-Goal Chain

Each postsecondary goal in the IEP should trace back to assessment data. Here is what that chain looks like in practice:

Assessment finding: The student scored "high interest" in animal care on the O*NET Interest Profiler, completed a 40-hour job shadow at a veterinary clinic with positive evaluator feedback, and demonstrated reliable task completion with a visual checklist.

Postsecondary goal: "After high school, the student will complete a veterinary technician certificate program at Colby Community College."

Transition service in the IEP: "The student will participate in Pre-ETS work-based learning at two additional animal care settings during the current school year to confirm vocational fit and build workplace readiness skills."

When parents review the transition section of the IEP, they should be able to see this chain clearly. If the goals do not match the assessment data — or if no assessment data exists — the team needs to go back and do the assessment work before finalizing the plan.

Questions for the IEP Meeting

At any transition IEP meeting, these questions help ensure the assessment foundation is solid:

What age-appropriate transition assessments have been administered, and can we review the results before discussing goals?

Are the postsecondary goals based on this assessment data, or were they written first?

Does the student need a functional vocational evaluation to clarify their employment goal? If so, when will it be scheduled?

Has the student participated in the assessment process — have they been asked directly about their preferences, interests, and goals?

The Kansas IEP Transition to Adulthood Guide includes an IEP Meeting Preparation Worksheet with these questions pre-loaded, plus space to record the team's answers and flag follow-up items for the next meeting.

See more Kansas guides →