Changing Guardianship in Alaska: How to Modify or Terminate a Court Order

Guardianship Orders Are Not Permanent

A guardianship order in Alaska is not a one-time, final decision. Alaska law explicitly recognizes that a person's capabilities can change over time, and the legal framework provides two mechanisms for revisiting the scope of a guardianship: petitioned reviews and automatic three-year reviews.

Under AS § 13.26.113, when the court finds that a respondent is incapacitated in some areas but retains capacity in others, it must appoint a limited guardian — not a full one. That same principle applies after appointment. If the ward develops new skills, receives effective treatment, or learns to manage decisions with support, the guardianship should contract to match the ward's actual needs.

Filing a Petition for Review (Form PG-190)

Any interested party — the ward, the guardian, a family member, or any other person with a legitimate interest — may petition the Alaska Superior Court at any time to modify or terminate a guardianship using Form PG-190 (Petition for Review of Guardianship).

The petition must explain what has changed and what modification is requested. Common grounds include:

• The ward has gained capacity in areas previously covered by the guardianship (through training, therapy, medication management, or life experience)
• The ward can now make decisions with the support of a Supported Decision-Making Agreement rather than a guardian
• The current guardian is unable or unwilling to continue serving
• The guardian has failed to meet annual reporting requirements or has acted outside the scope of the court order
• A less restrictive arrangement — such as a durable power of attorney or advance health care directive — can replace the guardianship

The petitioner must serve copies of the PG-190 upon the ward, the current guardian, and all interested parties named in the original case. The court then schedules a hearing and may appoint a new court visitor to evaluate the current situation.

The Automatic Three-Year Review

Even without a petition, Alaska law builds in periodic oversight. Every three years after the initial appointment, the court automatically appoints and pays for a court visitor to review the guardianship. The visitor interviews both the ward and the guardian, reviews the filed annual reports, and submits a formal report evaluating whether the guardianship should be modified, reduced, or terminated.

This three-year review is a critical safeguard — it ensures that guardianships do not persist unchanged simply because no one thought to challenge them. If the visitor's report suggests the ward has gained capacity, it can support a request to modify or terminate the guardianship.

What Modification Can Look Like

Modification is not all-or-nothing. The court can:

Narrow the scope: Convert a full guardianship to a limited one, returning specific decision-making authority — medical consent, residential choice, educational planning — to the ward while retaining guardian authority only where the ward still lacks capacity.

Change the guardian: Replace the current guardian with a different person, including transferring guardianship to a professional guardian through the Office of Public Advocacy when a family guardian can no longer serve.

Add a co-guardian: Appoint a second guardian to share responsibilities, which can be useful when the original guardian's health or availability changes.

Terminate entirely: End the guardianship and restore all decision-making rights to the formerly incapacitated person. Termination is appropriate when the ward demonstrates capacity across all domains previously covered by the court order.

When Termination Makes Sense

Termination is the right move when the ward no longer meets the legal standard for incapacity established in the original proceeding. This often happens when:

• A young adult who was placed under guardianship at 18 has since developed independent living skills and decision-making capability
• Effective mental health treatment has stabilized a condition that previously impaired capacity
• The ward has built a network of voluntary supports — SDMAs, powers of attorney, informal advisors — that make court-imposed oversight unnecessary

At a termination hearing, the court considers whether the guardianship remains necessary. Alaska's "strong policy of restraint" regarding protective proceedings, reaffirmed by the Alaska Supreme Court, means that the court should not maintain a guardianship when less restrictive alternatives would serve the ward's needs.

The Process for Filing

1. Obtain Form PG-190 from the Alaska Court System's Self-Help Center
2. Complete the form specifying the modification or termination requested and the factual basis for the change
3. File in the same Superior Court that issued the original order
4. Serve the ward, current guardian, and all interested parties
5. Attend the scheduled hearing — remote attendance may be available for rural families

The Alaska Adult Guardianship & Alternatives Guide covers the full modification and termination process, including how to document capacity improvements in the functional assessment worksheet and how to prepare evidence that less restrictive alternatives are working.

See more Alaska guides →