Vermont Supported Decision Making: How It Works Without a State Statute

Vermont's Unique Position on SDM

Thirty-one states have passed formal supported decision making statutes that legally bind third parties — banks, hospitals, schools — to recognize SDM agreements. Vermont isn't one of them.

That doesn't mean SDM is unavailable here. The Vermont Agency of Education, Vermont Family Network, Green Mountain Self-Advocates, and Disability Rights Vermont all actively promote supported decision making as the preferred first-line alternative to guardianship. School districts accept SDM agreements during IEP transition planning. Banks and healthcare providers increasingly recognize them, especially when paired with a HIPAA release or FERPA authorization.

The practical difference between having a statute and not having one is enforcement. In states with SDM laws, a bank that refuses to honor a valid agreement faces legal consequences. In Vermont, a refusal requires advocacy escalation — contacting Disability Rights Vermont or involving the institution's compliance department. It usually works, but it requires the agreement to be well-drafted and presented proactively.

What an SDM Agreement Looks Like in Vermont

The Vermont Family Network and Green Mountain Self-Advocates publish template agreements designed specifically for Vermont families. These aren't one-page forms — they're structured documents that specify:

Which decisions. Healthcare, finances, housing, education, employment, daily living, or specific subsets within those categories. The more precise, the more credible the agreement looks to an institution that hasn't seen one before.

Which supporters. Each person is named with their relationship and the specific decision areas they cover. A parent might handle medical and financial decisions while a sibling covers employment and daily living. Each supporter signs acknowledging their role.

How support works. The supporter explains options in plain language, helps gather information, accompanies the person to appointments, and helps them communicate their decision. The supporter does not decide — they facilitate. This distinction is the legal spine of the document.

Safeguards. The individual retains all legal rights. They can revoke the agreement at any time. Some agreements name a monitor — an independent person who periodically checks that supporters are respecting the individual's preferences rather than substituting their own judgment.

The Vermont Family Network also publishes a separate SDM Financial Agreement template that specifically addresses banking transactions, including a monitor consent form that gives a third party oversight of financial supporters.

Who SDM Works For

SDM works when the individual can understand basic choices and express preferences, even if they need significant help processing complex information.

A young adult with high-functioning autism who gets overwhelmed by dense paperwork but can articulate their own priorities — SDM fits. Someone with a mild intellectual disability who needs options explained in simpler terms but makes their own choices once they understand — SDM fits. An individual with a psychiatric condition whose judgment fluctuates but who has clear periods of capacity — SDM fits, with appropriate safeguards for crisis periods.

SDM does not work when the individual cannot express preferences at all, or when they are so vulnerable to manipulation that supporters could substitute their own judgment without detection. In those cases, limited guardianship through Vermont Probate Court provides court-backed authority with judicial oversight.

The line between "needs significant support" and "cannot participate in decisions" is where families agonize. There's no bright-line test. The Vermont Adult Guardianship & Alternatives Guide includes a functional assessment worksheet that walks through specific decision-making scenarios — managing medications, understanding a lease, choosing between treatment options — to help you map where your child falls on that continuum.

Making It Work Without a Statute

Since Vermont has no SDM enforcement mechanism, the practical burden falls on preparation.

Present before you need. Schedule meetings with the bank, primary care provider, pharmacy, and school before your child's 18th birthday. Walk through the agreement with each compliance officer. Ask them to note it in the file and confirm they'll contact the named supporter for the relevant decision areas.

Layer documents. An SDM agreement carries more weight when paired with legally recognized instruments. Combine it with a HIPAA release (healthcare records access), a FERPA release (school records access), and — if the individual has capacity — a durable financial power of attorney. The POA gives the financial supporter a statutory basis that exists independent of whether the bank recognizes SDM.

Document the arrangement. Keep a log of decisions made under the agreement: what was discussed, what options the individual considered, what they chose. If the agreement is ever challenged — by a family member, an institution, or in a future guardianship proceeding — this log demonstrates that the individual was genuinely participating in decisions, not being overridden by supporters.

Know the escalation path. If a provider refuses to honor the agreement, document the refusal in writing. Contact Disability Rights Vermont, which has intervened successfully with resistant institutions. If refusals become a pattern across multiple providers, that pattern itself becomes relevant evidence — either for training the provider or for demonstrating that SDM isn't working and a different arrangement is needed.

SDM as a Long-Term Framework

One thing families miss: SDM isn't a static document you sign once and file away. The individual's decision-making capabilities will evolve — they may gain confidence and need less support over time, or their needs may change as they encounter new life domains (employment, relationships, independent housing).

Build a review cycle into the agreement. Annually, sit down with the individual and their supporters to assess whether the decision areas, supporter assignments, and support methods still fit. Adjust and re-sign. This ongoing calibration is what makes SDM a living framework rather than a paperwork exercise.

If the arrangement stops working — the individual's capacity declines significantly, or exploitation risks emerge that informal monitoring can't address — you can always pursue guardianship later. Having a well-documented SDM history actually strengthens a guardianship petition if one becomes necessary, because it shows the court you tried the least restrictive option first and it wasn't sufficient.

See more Vermont guides →