How to Write a Guardianship Petition Narrative in North Dakota

The Narrative Is Where Most Self-Represented Petitions Fail

North Dakota's court system provides the standard forms — Form 1 (Petition for Appointment of Guardian), Form 2 (Confidential Information Form), and the rest — through the Legal Self-Help Center. The forms give you the structure. What they don't give you is guidance on how to fill in the narrative sections: the written descriptions of the proposed ward's condition, why you're seeking guardianship, and why less restrictive alternatives are insufficient.

These narrative sections are the substance of your petition. The guardian ad litem, court visitor, and expert examiner all read them before conducting their evaluations. The judge reads them before the hearing. A weak or vague narrative creates doubt about whether guardianship is actually necessary — even when it clearly is.

What the Court Needs to See Under NDCC 30.1-28-03

The statute requires the petition to establish several specific things, and your narrative needs to address each one directly:

The nature and severity of the proposed ward's condition. Don't use clinical shorthand alone ("severe intellectual disability"). Describe functional impact: what the person cannot do independently across the six decision-making areas the court evaluates — residential, educational, medical, legal, vocational, and financial. "She cannot independently manage her medications, distinguish between safe and unsafe dosing, or communicate allergic reactions to healthcare providers" is more useful to the court than "she has cognitive limitations."

Why a guardian is needed. Connect the functional limitations to actual risk. What has happened, or would predictably happen, without a guardian's authority? Real examples carry more weight than hypotheticals: "In March 2026, he signed a contract for a cell phone plan he did not understand, resulting in $800 in charges before the family became aware" demonstrates financial vulnerability in a way that "he might make poor financial decisions" does not.

Why less restrictive alternatives are insufficient. North Dakota law mandates that courts consider alternatives to guardianship before granting one. Your narrative must show that you've actually considered them. If Supported Decision-Making won't work, explain why — does the proposed ward lack the capacity to understand and participate in the agreement? If a power of attorney won't work, explain why — does the proposed ward lack the cognitive capacity to execute the document? A narrative that jumps straight to "we need full guardianship" without addressing alternatives signals to the court that you haven't done the analysis.

Whether limited guardianship would suffice. If you're requesting authority in all six areas, explain why. If the proposed ward can make some decisions independently — say, choosing their own clothing and social activities — acknowledge that and request limited guardianship restricted to the areas where they genuinely cannot function safely.

The Confidential Information Form (Form 2)

Form 2 collects sensitive identifying information — Social Security numbers and financial account numbers — that the court needs but that is filed confidentially, separate from the public petition. This form is where many self-represented petitioners make redaction errors.

Key points:

• List the proposed ward's known real and personal property and income in Form 1, along with any existing representative payee information
• Use Form 2 for the proposed ward's Social Security number and financial account numbers
• Double-check that no Social Security numbers or account numbers appear on Form 1 (the public petition) — they belong on the confidential Form 2

Common Mistakes in Self-Represented Narratives

Too clinical, not enough functional. Courts don't grant guardianship based on a diagnosis. They grant it based on demonstrated incapacity to make specific decisions. A petition that lists diagnoses without describing their functional impact forces the evaluators to do your work for you — and they may not reach the conclusions you'd expect.

Overreaching. Requesting full guardianship when limited would suffice undermines your credibility. If your adult child can choose their own meals, clothing, and recreational activities, a request for full authority over all six areas looks like you haven't seriously considered the least restrictive option. Courts in North Dakota are explicitly directed to preserve maximum self-reliance — your petition should demonstrate that you share that value.

Leaving out the timeline. Include how long the condition has existed, when it was diagnosed, what services are currently in place, and what changes are anticipated. This context helps the court and evaluators understand whether the need for guardianship is permanent, likely to evolve, or might resolve — which affects whether they order a limited or full guardianship and how they structure the five-year review.

Omitting the alternatives analysis. This is the single most common gap. Even one paragraph explaining that you explored SDM and it wouldn't work because the proposed ward cannot understand and voluntarily participate in the agreement demonstrates that you've followed the statutory framework.

Putting It Together

A well-structured narrative for a North Dakota guardianship petition follows this flow:

1. Identify the proposed ward and your relationship
2. Describe the condition and its functional impact across each relevant decision-making area
3. Provide specific examples of decisions the proposed ward cannot make safely
4. Explain what alternatives you considered and why they're insufficient
5. State what level of guardianship you're requesting and in which specific areas
6. Describe your plan for supporting the ward's continued development and maximum independence

The North Dakota Adult Guardianship & Alternatives Guide includes a narrative drafting worksheet that walks through each of these sections with prompts and examples specific to the North Dakota court system.

See more North Dakota guides →