E.R.K. v Hawaii Department of Education Special Education Age Limit

What Hawaii Act 163 Did to Special Education Students

Before 2013, Hawaii's Act 163 barred students with disabilities from attending public school after the school year in which they turned 20. The law created an artificial cutoff that forced families to exit the K-12 system years earlier than federal law intended, leaving students without the transition services and vocational preparation they needed before entering adulthood.

The problem was straightforward: Hawaii already offered free secondary education to non-disabled adults through its Community Schools for Adults program. Students without disabilities could attend these programs past age 20 — but students who needed special education could not stay in the public school system past that same age. That gap triggered a federal civil rights challenge.

The Ninth Circuit Decision That Changed Everything

In August 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided two linked cases: E.R.K. v. Department of Education and A.D. v. Department of Education. The court ruled that because Hawaii provided free public education to non-disabled adults aged 20 and 21 through Community Schools for Adults, the state violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) by denying equal access to special education services for disabled students of the same age.

The ruling was built on a core IDEA principle: a state that provides education to non-disabled students in a particular age range must provide a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) to students with disabilities in that same age range. Hawaii could not selectively cap services for students with IEPs while leaving the door open for everyone else.

The decision struck down Act 163's age restrictions. The practical result: HIDOE must now provide FAPE to eligible students with disabilities until their twenty-second birthday, unless they graduate with a regular high school diploma first.

What the Settlement Delivered

The litigation did not end with the Ninth Circuit ruling. In 2018, Hawaii reached a $10.25 million settlement to provide compensatory education services to nearly 500 young adults affected by the old age limit and denied services under Act 163.

The settlement underscored how much damage Act 163 had caused. Families who thought they had no recourse — who watched their children lose access to structured transition support at 20 — gained retroactive access to services that should never have been taken away.

How the Ruling Shapes Transition Planning Today

The E.R.K. decision is now embedded in daily practice across the Hawaii Department of Education. Under Hawaii Administrative Rules Chapter 60, eligible students with disabilities receive FAPE until the day they turn 22 or until they graduate with a standard high school diploma — whichever comes first.

This extended timeline is especially valuable for students on the Certificate of Completion track. Because a Certificate of Completion is not classified as a "regular high school diploma" under IDEA, these students can participate in graduation ceremonies with their peers while continuing to receive school-based transition services, work-study placements, and daily living skills instruction for up to four additional years.

For families navigating the transition from school to adult services, the E.R.K. decision provides the legal foundation for refusing any premature exit. If a school suggests that a student should leave the system before age 22, the family has clear legal backing to insist on continued services.

What to Do If Your School Gets the Timeline Wrong

Despite the ruling being over a decade old, some families still encounter confusion about when services end. If a teacher, counselor, or administrator suggests that special education services must stop at age 18, 20, or 21, that information is incorrect under current Hawaii law.

Start by requesting an IEP meeting in writing and citing HAR Chapter 60 and the E.R.K. decision. Ask the team to document the student's continued eligibility and update the transition plan to use the full timeline available. If the school does not correct the error, you can file a State Written Complaint with the HIDOE Complaints Management Program or contact the Hawaii Disability Rights Center for advocacy support.

The Hawaii IEP Transition to Adulthood Guide maps out the complete age-by-age timeline from 14 through 22, including the legal citations you need to hold the school to the correct exit date.

See more Hawaii guides →