Best Louisiana Turning-18 Resource for Parents Who Missed the School Transition Meeting

If your child's school handed you a transition packet during an IEP meeting — or if you just realized you should have received one under Louisiana's House Bill 362 and didn't — here's what matters: the school's written disclosure is a starting point, not a plan. It tells you that legal options exist (SDM, mandate, tutorship, interdiction) but doesn't tell you how to evaluate which one fits your family, how to execute the documents, or how the timelines interact with each other. The best resource for filling that gap is one that picks up exactly where the school disclosure leaves off and gives you an actionable chronological workflow rather than a list of definitions. The Louisiana Adult Guardianship & Alternatives Guide was built specifically for this scenario.

What the School Is Required to Tell You

House Bill 362, passed in the 2024 Regular Session and effective August 1, 2024, requires every Louisiana LEA (local education agency) to provide comprehensive written information about the transfer of rights at age 18 to parents of students on alternate assessments. This disclosure must be given at the first IEP meeting of the school year for students who are 14, 15, 16, or 17 years old.

The required disclosure must explain and distinguish:

• Supported Decision-Making agreements under the Dustin Gary Act
• Contracts of mandate (powers of attorney)
• Continuing tutorship (full and limited)
• Limited and full interdiction

This is a significant improvement over the pre-2024 landscape, where many families received no formal guidance and discovered the turning-18 transition only when their child's doctor suddenly refused to share medical information.

What the School Disclosure Doesn't Cover

The disclosure tells you what exists. It doesn't tell you:

How to evaluate which option fits. The school isn't going to assess your child's decision-making capacity across specific domains (healthcare, finances, housing, daily living) or recommend a specific legal mechanism. That's not their role, and they're appropriately cautious about anything that could be construed as legal advice.

The coroner concurrence process for continuing tutorship. If your child is between 15 and 17 and you decide continuing tutorship is the right path, you need the written concurrence of your parish coroner. The school will tell you this requirement exists. They won't tell you which documentation the coroner expects, how to schedule the review, or how to sequence the coroner process with the court filing.

How the legal transition interacts with benefits. At 18, your child also faces the SSI adult redetermination, potential SSDI eligibility through Disabled Adult Child benefits, and ABLE account options. The legal authority decision (who can sign medical forms, manage money, represent your child to agencies) intersects directly with the benefits transition (who can manage SSI payments, who applies for DAC benefits, who opens and controls the ABLE account). The school's disclosure covers the legal options but not this intersection.

The deadline hierarchy. Continuing tutorship must be filed before 18. SDM and mandates can only be executed after 18 (the individual must be a legal adult to sign). The SSI redetermination happens at 18. ABLE accounts can be opened at any time. These deadlines overlap and interact, and missing one can permanently change which options remain available.

Comparing Your Options After the School Meeting

Who This Is For

• Parents who received the HB 362 transition disclosure at an IEP meeting and now have a list of legal terms but no clear action plan
• Parents who should have received the disclosure but didn't — their child is 14–17, on alternate assessment, and no written information was provided (this is a compliance issue the school needs to fix, but you still need the information now)
• Families whose child is 15–17 and approaching the continuing tutorship filing window who need to understand the coroner concurrence process, not just the legal definitions
• Parents who feel behind — the 18th birthday is months away and they haven't started any legal planning

Who This Is NOT For

• Parents whose child has already turned 18 and the continuing tutorship window has closed — the guide still covers interdiction, SDM, and mandates, but the pre-18 planning chapters won't apply
• Families who have already hired a disability attorney and are working through the legal process with professional guidance
• Parents whose child is on a standard diploma track and won't need legal authority arrangements at 18

The Timeline That Catches Families Off Guard

Most families discover the legal transition 6–12 months before the 18th birthday. By that point, some deadlines are already tight:

The continuing tutorship window opens at 15. Many families don't learn about this option until 16 or 17, which compresses the time to get psychological evaluations, secure the coroner's concurrence, and file the petition. The 18th birthday is an absolute deadline — there is no grace period, no extension, and no retroactive filing.

The SDM and mandate paradox: you can prepare these before 18, but you can't execute them until your child is a legal adult. This means the legal transition day itself requires coordination — having documents ready to sign, a notary scheduled, and healthcare providers notified.

The SSI redetermination starts at 18 and evaluates your child under the adult standard of disability. If your child has been receiving SSI under the childhood standard, the adult redetermination may change their eligibility. Knowing who will manage benefits (Representative Payee vs. curator vs. the individual themselves) needs to be decided in coordination with the legal authority decision.

The Legal Authority Blueprint sequences all of these deadlines into a single chronological workflow with specific action items for each phase — from the earliest continuing tutorship filing window through the first year of adulthood.

Frequently Asked Questions

My child is on alternate assessment but the school never gave us the HB 362 transition disclosure. What should we do?

Request it in writing from the school's special education coordinator. Under La. R.S. 17:1944.H(1), the LEA is required to provide this information at the first IEP meeting of the school year for students aged 14–17 on alternate assessment. If the school hasn't complied, document the request and follow up. You can also contact your regional Families Helping Families center for support in getting the information. In the meantime, the Legal Authority Blueprint covers everything the disclosure should explain — and more.

We got the disclosure but it was just a one-page handout with definitions. Is that enough?

Definitions are the starting point, not the plan. Knowing that continuing tutorship exists is different from knowing how to file the petition, secure the coroner concurrence, and assemble the documentation. Knowing that SDM is an option is different from knowing how to structure an SDM agreement that healthcare providers will actually accept. The school's disclosure fulfills their legal obligation under HB 362 — your planning needs go well beyond that.

Our child turns 18 in four months. Is it too late for continuing tutorship?

Not necessarily, but you need to act immediately. The critical path items are: obtaining or locating existing psychological evaluations showing cognitive functioning below two-thirds of average peers, scheduling the parish coroner review, and filing the verified petition with the clerk of court. Four months is a tight timeline; start the documentation assembly immediately and confirm with the parish coroner and clerk of court that the review and filing can be completed before the 18th birthday. The Legal Authority Blueprint's court filing preparation checklist identifies every document you need so nothing gets missed under time pressure.

Should we do SDM even if we're also filing for continuing tutorship?

There's no conflict between the two. Filing for continuing tutorship doesn't prevent you from also preparing SDM agreements and mandates. Many families use a layered approach — continuing tutorship provides the court-supervised safety net, while SDM agreements cover specific domains where the young adult can participate meaningfully in decision-making. If the court ultimately grants limited continuing tutorship under Act 123, the SDM agreements can cover the domains the court didn't restrict.

What's the cost difference between handling this ourselves and hiring an attorney?

For continuing tutorship: self-directed filing costs roughly $300–$600 in court deposits, plus any documentation or testing costs (and the guide at $24), while an attorney adds $3,000–$7,000. For voluntary alternatives only (SDM + mandate): self-directed costs are typically under $500 without attorney drafting, while mandate drafting can add $150–$500; an attorney's planning engagement is $1,000–$3,000. For interdiction: self-directed is theoretically possible but the procedural complexity and adversarial nature usually justify the $3,000–$7,000 attorney cost.

See more Louisiana guides →