DSE 2005 Review 2025: What the Disability Standards Changes Mean for Parents

The Disability Standards for Education 2005 is Australia's primary federal legislation governing how schools must treat students with disability. It has not been substantially reformed since it was first made under the Disability Discrimination Act in 2005. The 2025 review — currently underway — is the most significant rethink of the framework in two decades, driven by the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability.

Here is what is being proposed, what stage the review is at, and what it could mean practically for families navigating the system now and in the coming years.

Why the Review Is Happening

The Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability, which concluded in 2023, found systemic failures in how educational institutions had treated people with disability. Its findings documented exclusion, restraint, and environments where students with disability faced abuse without adequate accountability mechanisms.

The DSE 2005 review is one of several legislative reforms responding to the Royal Commission's recommendations. The discussion paper released by the Australian Government for the review sets out a number of key reform areas, reflecting both what the Royal Commission identified and longer-standing gaps that advocates and families had highlighted for years.

What Is Being Proposed

1. Extending the DSE to Early Childhood Education and Care

One of the most significant proposed reforms is formally extending the Disability Standards to cover Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) providers — that is, childcare centres, long day care, family day care, and preschools.

Currently, the DSE 2005 applies to schools and higher education, but not explicitly to ECEC providers (who are subject to the broader DDA, but without the sector-specific standards). The proposed extension would create the same "reasonable adjustments" and enrolment protection obligations for ECEC providers that schools already face.

For families of young children with disability or developmental delay, this would be a material change. ECEC is where early intervention is most effective, and legal clarity around provider obligations would strengthen the position of families seeking adjustments from childcare providers who currently have more room to resist.

2. Mandatory, Trauma-Informed Complaint Management

The review proposes embedding mandatory trauma-informed complaint management procedures directly into state school registration requirements. Under this proposal, schools would be required to have documented complaint procedures that meet a defined standard — and state registration authorities would be required to verify compliance.

Currently, complaint handling varies enormously between schools and jurisdictions. A parent whose complaint is mishandled or dismissed has to escalate to external bodies, a process that can take months and requires significant stamina. Requiring trauma-informed complaint procedures at the registration level would create a minimum standard that applies to every school as a condition of operating.

3. Student Voice in Reasonable Adjustment Decisions

The current DSE 2005 mandates consultation with students and their parents or carers before reasonable adjustments are determined. In practice, consultation often means the parent speaks on the child's behalf, while the student — particularly older secondary students — is not directly engaged.

The review proposes strengthening protections to ensure older students with disability have a legally protected, guaranteed voice in their own adjustment decisions. This would shift the framework from a primarily parent-and-school dynamic toward one that explicitly recognises students as participants in their own education planning.

For secondary school students with disability who are approaching adulthood, this could be a meaningful change — particularly for students who are capable of expressing preferences but whose views are routinely sidelined in favour of what parents or teachers think is best.

4. Accountability for the NCCD-Education Funding Disconnect

The review is also addressing the persistent frustration that families feel about NCCD funding — specifically the fact that federal funding is allocated based on aggregate school data, but there is no legal requirement for that funding to be spent on the specific student who generated it.

This has been a systemic complaint for years. Proposals being tested in the review include greater transparency obligations for schools around how disability loading is spent, and potentially firmer requirements around the relationship between a student's NCCD level and the support they actually receive.

What It Means for Families Now

The review is ongoing. Final recommendations and any resulting legislative changes are likely to follow a period of public consultation and government consideration. This means the current DSE 2005 remains the operative law.

For families dealing with schools today, the existing standards still give significant leverage. The review does not diminish any current rights — if anything, the reform discussion is producing greater public attention on what schools are currently obligated to do and how often they fall short.

The areas the review is focusing on — complaint handling, consultation with students, transparency of funding — are areas where the current standards already provide protections that many schools are not fully meeting. A family that understands and invokes those existing protections is ahead of most.

How the Review Connects to NDIS Reform

The DSE review is happening alongside significant NDIS reforms, including the planned Thriving Kids program (see what Thriving Kids means for school-age children). These reforms are moving in parallel rather than in coordination, which means families with young children are navigating two changing frameworks simultaneously.

The principle the review keeps returning to is the same one the NDIS reform is grappling with: services must follow the child's needs, not bureaucratic eligibility categories. How that principle translates into practical accountability mechanisms is what the next phase of both reforms is attempting to define.

Getting Across the Current Framework

Whatever the review produces, the DSE 2005 as it currently stands gives Australian families more leverage than most realise — and more leverage than most schools volunteer to acknowledge.

The Australia Disability Assessment Decoder covers the current DSE 2005 obligations in detail: what "reasonable adjustments" actually requires, how consultation is supposed to work, what the NCCD categorisation process means for your child, and how to build a paper trail that supports a complaint if things break down.

The 2025 review may strengthen the framework. In the meantime, the existing framework, properly used, is already a powerful tool.

See more Australia guides →