Independent Educational Evaluation in Colorado: Your IEE Rights Under ECEA

The school's evaluation says your child doesn't qualify — or the evaluation found a disability but you believe it missed the full picture. Maybe scores seem inconsistent with what you see at home, or the evaluator spent only a few hours with your child and produced a report that doesn't match 10 years of parenting. In Colorado, you have a specific legal right to challenge that evaluation: the Independent Educational Evaluation, or IEE.

Understanding how this right works — and how Colorado's Administrative Unit structure shapes the process — is the difference between exercising it effectively and letting the district stall you out.

What an IEE Is

An Independent Educational Evaluation is an evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner who is not employed by the Administrative Unit (AU) responsible for your child's education. It can cover psychoeducational testing, speech-language assessment, occupational therapy, behavioral evaluation, or any area evaluated by the district.

Under federal IDEA and Colorado ECEA rules, if you disagree with the AU's evaluation, you have the right to request an IEE at public expense — meaning the district pays for it. This right exists once per district evaluation. It is not unlimited, but it is absolute once triggered.

How to Trigger Your IEE Rights in Colorado

You trigger IEE rights by making a written request to the AU stating that you disagree with the district's evaluation and are requesting an independent evaluation at public expense. The request does not need to be elaborate. A brief email or letter stating that you disagree with the evaluation dated [date] and are requesting an IEE at public expense is sufficient to start the clock.

Once you submit that request, the AU must do one of two things within a reasonable time:

1. Agree to fund the IEE and provide you with information about evaluator criteria, or
2. File for a due process hearing to defend the adequacy of its own evaluation.

"Reasonable time" is not defined to the day in federal or Colorado regulations, but CDE guidance and advocacy practice treat unreasonable delay — weeks passing without a response — as a procedural violation. If the AU doesn't respond promptly, document every day that passes and consider filing a state complaint with the CDE Exceptional Student Services Unit (ESSU).

What Happens If the District Files for Due Process

If the AU chooses to file for due process rather than fund the IEE, a hearing officer will determine whether the district's evaluation was appropriate. If the hearing officer finds it was, you do not automatically receive a publicly funded IEE — though you still have the right to get one at your own expense.

If the hearing officer finds the district's evaluation was not appropriate, you are entitled to the IEE at public expense.

Filing for due process is the district's right, not a punitive move against you. But it is costly and time-consuming for the district, which is why many AUs simply fund the IEE rather than litigate. Knowing this shifts the dynamic — your written request alone often moves the process.

Evaluator Criteria and AU Requirements

The AU can set reasonable criteria for the independent evaluator — qualifications, geographic area — as long as those criteria don't limit your choice in a way that effectively denies the IEE. In practice, Colorado AUs often provide a list of pre-approved evaluators or specify that the evaluator must hold a Colorado CDE license.

You are not required to use an evaluator from their list, but the evaluator must meet the same licensure standards as district evaluators. If you find your own evaluator, confirm their CDE licensure before scheduling.

One Colorado-specific consideration: in rural BOCES jurisdictions, qualified independent evaluators may be geographically distant. The AU cannot use geography as grounds to delay or deny the IEE. If the AU's area of operation is a rural BOCES region with no local private psychologists, they may need to fund travel or conduct a remote assessment.

How the IEE Interacts With Colorado's 60-Day Timeline

When an IEE request is pending, it does not pause the 90-day timeline for developing the initial IEP if eligibility has already been determined. What it does do is give you additional evaluation data that the IEP team is legally required to consider at the IEP meeting.

"Consider" means the team must review and discuss the IEE results. It does not mean the team must adopt the IEE conclusions wholesale. However, if the IEP team ignores credible IEE data without documented reason, that is a procedural violation you can raise through a state complaint.

If eligibility has not yet been determined and the IEE is pending, you may want to request that the eligibility meeting be delayed until the IEE is complete — so the team is working from a complete picture. The district is not required to grant this request, but it is a reasonable ask that many districts accommodate.

When the District's Own Evaluation Is Incomplete

The most common scenario parents encounter: the district's evaluation found a single disability category but missed co-occurring conditions. A school psychologist identifies ADHD under Other Health Impaired but doesn't assess for dyslexia. Or the evaluation focused on academic achievement and ignored executive functioning deficits that explain why homework completion is impossible.

An IEE in this situation is not about disputing the existing findings — it is about expanding the picture. You can request an IEE for a specific area of evaluation you believe was inadequately assessed, even if you don't dispute the overall eligibility determination. Document specifically which area you believe was missed and why.

Twice-Exceptional Students and IEE

Colorado's recognition of twice-exceptional (2e) students — those with both a qualifying disability and gifted identification — makes IEEs particularly important. Standard district evaluations often use a Full Scale IQ score to determine eligibility. For 2e students, this composite score can mask both the giftedness and the disability, because high verbal skills inflate the score while low processing speed or working memory deflate it.

An IEE for a suspected 2e student should specifically assess subtest score scatter, not just composite scores. The evaluator should analyze whether there is a statistically significant discrepancy between fluid reasoning/verbal comprehension and processing speed/working memory — a hallmark pattern in students with dyslexia, ADHD, or processing disorders who also have advanced cognitive ability.

The CDE's Twice-Exceptional Resource Handbook specifically acknowledges this masking effect. If the district's evaluation used a composite IQ to rule out giftedness or to minimize the disability, an IEE that analyzes the full subtest profile is your strongest tool.

What to Do With the IEE Results

Once the IEE report is complete:

1. Send it to the AU in writing before any scheduled eligibility or IEP meeting.
2. Request an IEP meeting to review the IEE results if one is not already scheduled.
3. At the meeting, the team is required to consider the results. Bring the evaluator if possible — many private psychologists will attend an IEP meeting (sometimes for an additional fee) to explain their findings directly.
4. If the IEE supports a different eligibility determination than the district's original evaluation, request that the eligibility be reconsidered.
5. If the team refuses to change the eligibility determination despite strong IEE evidence, that is grounds for a state complaint or due process hearing.

State Complaint vs. Due Process for IEE Violations

If the AU refuses to fund an IEE without filing for due process, or unreasonably delays responding to your request, you have two options:

State complaint to the CDE ESSU. Colorado state complaints must be filed within one year of the alleged violation. CDE has 60 days to investigate and issue a decision. A finding of noncompliance typically results in a corrective action plan requiring the district to fund the IEE.

Due process hearing. More adversarial and time-consuming, but gives you the right to a formal hearing before an impartial hearing officer. Due process complaints have a 2-year statute of limitations in Colorado.

For most IEE disputes, a state complaint is faster and less costly than due process.

The Colorado IEP & 504 Blueprint includes the specific request language needed to trigger IEE rights, how to interpret the AU's response, and what to do when the district stalls — with ECEA citations you can reference in writing.

See more United States homeschool guides →