What Is My State's IEP Called? Australia's 8-State Learning Plan Guide

Australian parents searching for "IEP" guidance online quickly run into an uncomfortable problem: most of the useful content is American, built around the US Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and legally irrelevant to Australian families.

Australia does not have a single national IEP system. Education is a state and territory responsibility, which means each jurisdiction has its own name, its own process, and its own funding mechanism for individual learning plans. Here is what each state and territory calls its version of the IEP, and what you need to know about how each system actually works.

New South Wales: Personalised Learning and Support Plan (PLSP)

In NSW public schools, the primary planning document is the Personalised Learning and Support Plan (PLSP). This document is developed collaboratively by the school's Learning and Support Team, the classroom teacher, the student's parents, and — where appropriate — the student.

The key NSW funding mechanism for students with higher-level needs in mainstream classes is Integration Funding Support (IFS). IFS targets students who require adjustments beyond what the school's base learning and support resources can provide. The application goes through the school's internal team and is reviewed by a regional placement panel. Between 2018 and 2023, 74% of priority-one Access Requests were supported by those panels — but securing IFS requires proper documentation, not verbal requests.

For secondary students preparing for the HSC, disability provisions are managed separately by the NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA), requiring contemporary medical and school-based evidence.

Victoria: Disability Inclusion Profile and Student Support Group

Victoria is mid-transition from the Program for Students with Disabilities (PSD) — a heavily diagnosis-driven model — to the new Disability Inclusion framework.

The cornerstone of the new system is the Disability Inclusion Profile, conducted by an independent facilitator. The profile identifies a student's functional needs and strengths (not just deficits) and determines eligibility for individualised Tier 3 funding. It is not a document parents complete alone — it requires a facilitated process, which can take weeks to organise.

Victorian policy mandates a Student Support Group (SSG) for every student receiving Disability Inclusion funding. The SSG formally includes parents, teachers, and school leadership. This is the meeting where learning goals are set, reviewed, and documented. Parents have the right to be part of this group and to see the resulting planning documents.

For students with milder needs — ADHD, dyslexia, mild autism — Victoria's new Tier 2 block funding provides school-level resources even without a formal Disability Inclusion Profile, addressing a major gap in the previous PSD system.

Queensland: Education Adjustment Plan and Reasonable Adjustments Resourcing

Queensland has shifted from the older Education Adjustment Program (EAP) — a rigidly categorised, verification-heavy system — to the Reasonable Adjustments Resourcing (RAR) model, which aligns more closely with the federal NCCD's functional approach.

Under RAR, schools document a student's needs and the adjustments in place without needing to fit the student into one of the EAP's six diagnostic categories. For students seeking placement in a state special school, a verification process still applies — and if the school disagrees with a state verification decision, the principal can lodge a formal review within 21 days.

Planning documents in Queensland may be called an Education Adjustment Plan or an Individual Curriculum Plan (ICP) depending on the school type and the student's curriculum pathway.

South Australia: The One Plan

South Australia's unified planning document is the One Plan — previously known as the Negotiated Education Plan (NEP). Every student with a disability or significant need in SA must have a One Plan if they require documented support. The One Plan is directly linked to SA's funding mechanism: the Inclusive Education Support Program (IESP).

The IESP replaced an older, paper-heavy application system in 2019 with a streamlined online process tied directly to the One Plan. Funding is allocated across nine categories of support on a functional needs basis — diagnosis alone does not determine the tier.

For parents, the One Plan meeting is the critical intervention point. Requesting an early review of the One Plan, or requesting that it be established before the standard transition point, is a tactical move that can accelerate funding access.

Western Australia: Schools Plus Funding and Individual Education Plans

Western Australia's mainstream support mechanism is Schools Plus funding, which provides supplementary resources for students who meet specific eligibility criteria. WA also uses traditional Individual Education Plan (IEP) and Individual Pathway Plan (IPP) terminology in different contexts.

WA maintains a statewide School Psychology Service employing over 440 psychologists who conduct complex behavioural and learning assessments directly within the public school system — a significant internal resource not available in most other states at the same scale. WA also operates Schools of Special Educational Needs (SSEN), centralised hubs of specialist teachers who deploy to support local schools rather than students attending a separate campus.

Tasmania: Educational Adjustments Disability Funding

Tasmania uses a Learning Plan as the core planning document and funds support through the Educational Adjustments Disability Funding model, fully implemented in 2020.

A distinctive Tasmanian feature is the annual visit by a Disability Educational Adjustment Moderator to each school. The moderator reviews the Learning Plan and evidence, and agrees on the NCCD adjustment level with the school team. Tasmania adds sub-levels within the "Extensive" category (High, Mid, Low) to ensure more precise financial allocation.

Also notable: Tasmania's funding is portable. If a student at Substantial or Extensive level transfers to another Tasmanian government school, their targeted funding follows them — continuity of support that parents in other states often fight to achieve.

Australian Capital Territory: Individual Learning Plan and Student Centred Appraisal of Need

In the ACT, the central document is the Individual Learning Plan (ILP), developed through a process called a Student Centred Appraisal of Need (SCAN). The SCAN determines what resources and adjustments are required. The ACT model places a heavy emphasis on collaborative planning — the ILP must be developed with input from classroom teachers, executive staff, parents, and the student where appropriate.

For complex cases, the ACT's Network Student Engagement Teams (NSET) deploy multidisciplinary allied health professionals and specialist educators directly into schools.

Northern Territory: Student Needs Profile

The Northern Territory uses a Student Needs Profile as the assessment mechanism for students with complex needs, and the Individual Learning Plan (ILP) as the operational document. The NT categorises students with disability under the broader Students with Additional Needs (SWAN) framework, which also includes students experiencing trauma and severe health conditions.

The NT faces unique geographical challenges in delivering specialist assessments to remote and regional communities. The territory has leaned heavily on online training and professional networks to build local school capacity for functional assessment without requiring access to urban-based diagnostic specialists.

What This Means for Your Family

The naming differences are not just cosmetic. Each system has its own eligibility triggers, its own documentation requirements, and its own escalation pathways when things go wrong. A parent moving from SA to VIC needs to understand that their child's One Plan does not automatically translate into a Victorian Disability Inclusion Profile — a new process is required, which takes time and proactive action.

Across all eight jurisdictions, the federal NCCD framework applies as the underlying funding mechanism. Understanding NCCD — and what the 10-week evidence requirement means for what schools must document — gives parents a national-level lever regardless of what state-specific label their child's plan carries.

The Australia Disability Assessment Decoder covers all eight state and territory systems in detail, with the specific steps to request a planning document, escalate when schools stall, and navigate the state-federal funding boundary that no single government website maps clearly.

See more Australia guides →