Out-of-District and Private Placement for Special Education in South Dakota

Your child's school cannot provide the services their IEP requires. Maybe there is no specialist on staff. Maybe the district's special education program is too large and your child is lost in it, or too small and lacks the specialized instruction they need. Whatever the reason, when the local district cannot deliver a Free Appropriate Public Education, federal law gives you the right to demand placement elsewhere—and requires the district to pay for it.

This is one of the most powerful provisions in special education law, and one of the most underused by South Dakota parents who don't know it exists.

The Legal Foundation: FAPE Over Proximity

South Dakota's LRE requirement (ARSD 24:05:28:01) requires that children with disabilities be educated with non-disabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. But LRE has limits. The statute also says that removal to special classes or separate schools is permissible—and sometimes required—when the nature or severity of the disability means the child cannot be educated adequately in a regular classroom even with supplementary aids and services.

The governing principle is that FAPE comes first. If your local district cannot provide a Free Appropriate Public Education, the child's placement must change to one that can—regardless of cost, distance, or administrative inconvenience.

This is not a loophole. It is the explicit structure of IDEA. South Dakota's own administrative rules codify it. And the state has been paying for out-of-district placements for decades: the cost of these placements increased by over $4 million between 2014 and 2018 alone, driven directly by the district's inability to staff specialized positions in rural areas.

When Out-of-District Placement Is Appropriate

The IEP team—which includes you—is responsible for determining placement. Out-of-district placement becomes appropriate when:

The district lacks required specialists. A child who needs intensive behavioral support, a specialized reading program for dyslexia, or a communication-based program for complex autism needs cannot be served by a district that doesn't have those programs. The district's inability to provide the service is not a reason to lower the level of service in the IEP; it is a reason to change where the service is delivered.

The current placement has failed to produce progress. If your child has been in the same program for two or three years without making meaningful progress on IEP goals, the placement may not be appropriate. The Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Supreme Court decision (2017) established that FAPE requires more than trivial progress—the IEP must be "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances." No progress is not appropriate.

The child's needs cannot be met with supplementary aids. For students with significant behavioral needs, medically fragile conditions, or profound communication deficits, the general education environment—even with extensive supports—may not be an appropriate setting.

A residential program is the least restrictive appropriate option. In extreme cases, a student may require round-the-clock therapeutic support that only a residential facility can provide. These placements are expensive, and districts resist them vigorously. But if the IEP team determines it is necessary for FAPE, the district must fund it.

The Private Placement Option: Unilateral Placement

If the district is offering you a placement you believe is inappropriate, you have two paths:

Path 1: Work through the IEP process. Reject the proposed placement in writing, request a new IEP meeting, and propose a specific alternative placement. Request that the district explore out-of-district options and report back with options and costs. If they refuse, demand a Prior Written Notice documenting the refusal.

Path 2: Unilateral private placement with reimbursement. Under IDEA, if you believe the district's proposed placement is inappropriate and you place your child in a private school unilaterally (without the district's agreement), you may be entitled to reimbursement if:

1. The district's proposed placement was not appropriate (not FAPE)
2. Your chosen private placement is appropriate
3. You gave the district written notice at least ten business days before removing your child

Reimbursement cases are litigated through due process, and they are not guaranteed. Courts apply a balancing test. But parents who are well-documented—who gave proper notice, who have evidence that the district's placement failed, and who chose an appropriate private program—have prevailed in these cases.

South Dakota's Cooperative Structure Complicates Placement Decisions

In many rural districts, placement decisions aren't made solely by the local school principal. Regional cooperatives—entities like the Black Hills Special Services Cooperative (BHSSC), the Cornbelt Educational Cooperative, or the Northeast Educational Services Cooperative—control the budget and availability of specialized services across multiple districts.

This means that when your local district tells you there's no out-of-district option available or that they don't have the budget, the actual decision-maker may be the cooperative's executive director, not the school principal. Understanding this structure matters because your advocacy—including state complaints and due process—needs to target the right party.

If the cooperative is the entity providing (or failing to provide) the service, they can be named in a state complaint. The SD DOE's complaint investigation process covers cooperatives as well as local education agencies.

How to Request an Out-of-District Placement

1. Put it in writing. Send a letter to the Special Education Director requesting that the IEP team convene to discuss placement. State specifically that you believe the current placement cannot provide FAPE and that you want the team to explore out-of-district options.

2. Come to the IEP meeting with data. Your child's lack of progress, their specific needs the current program cannot address, and any evaluations (including independent evaluations) that support a more intensive placement.

3. If the district refuses, demand Prior Written Notice. The PWN must explain what they refused, why, what data they used, and what other options they considered. This document becomes the cornerstone of your state complaint or due process filing.

4. File a state complaint or request mediation. State complaints are resolved in 60 calendar days and are free to file. Mediation is also free and can produce faster resolution without a formal hearing.

The South Dakota IEP & 504 Advocacy Playbook at /us/south-dakota/advocacy/ includes a placement escalation guide that maps the chain of command in South Dakota's cooperative structure, along with templates for requesting out-of-district placement evaluations and responding to district refusals with the correct ARSD citations.

See more United States guides →