Assistive Technology in PEI Schools: C-Pens, AAC Devices, and How to Get Them on the IEP

Assistive technology can be the difference between a student participating meaningfully in their education and being left behind while waiting years for the "right" support to materialize. In PEI, assistive technology is an integral part of the inclusive education model — but it only protects your child's access to it across all classes if it is explicitly written into their IEP.

Here is what is actually available in PEI schools, how each technology is used, and what you need to do to make sure your child gets access to the tools that work for them.

Who Decides What AT Your Child Gets

The assistive technology recommendation process involves a team, typically led by an Occupational Therapist (OT) or Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) in consultation with the Inclusive Education Consultant and Resource Teacher. The AT recommendation is based on:

• The student's specific learning or communication profile (from an assessment if available, or from documented observational data)
• The tasks the student needs to complete in the educational environment
• The technology available through the PSB and the student's ability to use it

Parents have a right to participate in this discussion. If you have used a specific tool at home or in a private setting that has worked for your child, bring that information to the IEP meeting. You can also request that an OT or SLP assess your child's AT needs if that has not been done.

The critical step after any AT recommendation: get it written explicitly into the IEP. A general note that "technology supports will be used as needed" does not protect anything. The IEP should name the specific tool, specify in which subjects and settings it will be used, and identify who is responsible for ensuring access and functionality.

C-Pens: Reading Support for Students with Dyslexia

A C-Pen (also called a reading pen or scanning pen) is a small handheld device that scans a line of printed text and reads it aloud through an earpiece. The student simply runs the pen across a sentence and the text is converted to speech in real time.

For students with dyslexia or other decoding difficulties, a C-Pen can be transformative. It provides independence — the student can access any printed text without waiting for a teacher or EA to read it to them. It works silently with an earpiece, so it does not disrupt other students.

PEI schools use C-Pens as part of the assistive technology toolkit for students with reading difficulties. The PSB has these devices available. If your child's Resource Teacher or OT has suggested reading supports, specifically ask whether a C-Pen has been considered and whether your child has been given adequate opportunity to trial it.

When advocating for a C-Pen to be included in the IEP:

• Ask what reading support is currently being provided and how effective the data shows it to be
• Request a trial period with the device if your child has not used one before
• Once it is established as effective, request that the IEP specify: the student will use a C-Pen reading device during all independent reading and test-taking in all classes

That last phrase — "in all classes" — matters. Without it, a substitute teacher or a classroom teacher unfamiliar with the accommodation may not provide access.

AAC Devices: Communication Support for Non-Verbal Students

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) encompasses all tools that help a student communicate when verbal speech is insufficient or absent. In PEI schools, AAC is coordinated primarily by Speech-Language Pathologists.

AAC exists on a spectrum:

Low-tech AAC: Picture exchange communication systems (PECS), communication boards, symbol-based choice cards. No batteries, no screens — useful as a foundation and backup.

High-tech AAC: Dedicated speech-generating devices (SGDs) — tablets loaded with specialized AAC software that allows the student to compose messages that are then spoken aloud. Tools like LAMP Words for Life, Proloquo2Go, or TouchChat are commonly used in school settings.

The SLP is responsible for assessing AAC needs, recommending the appropriate system, and providing training to the student, family, and teachers. The school is responsible for ensuring the student has access to their AAC system across all settings — not just during speech-language sessions.

Common problems parents encounter:

• The device stays in the resource room. An AAC device is only useful if the student has it with them. The IEP must specify that the student will have their AAC device available at all times during the school day, including recess, lunch, and specials.
• Insufficient staff training. If classroom teachers do not know how to support the student in using their AAC system, communication breaks down and the device goes unused. Request training for all staff who work with your child.
• No plan for device maintenance or backup. Batteries die, software needs updates, devices break. Ask who is responsible for maintaining the device and what the backup plan is.

FM Systems: Hearing Support in the Classroom

For students who are deaf or hard of hearing, FM systems amplify the teacher's voice directly through a receiver worn by the student, reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of classroom environments. HEAR PEI provides itinerant teaching and FM systems for students with hearing loss.

If your child has documented hearing loss, request a referral through the school to the HEAR program if that has not been done. The FM system should be listed explicitly in the IEP along with the requirement that all classroom teachers and substitute teachers use the transmitter when working with the student.

Other Common AT Supports in PEI Classrooms

Beyond the headline technologies, PEI schools use a range of additional AT tools:

Text-to-speech software: Applications that read digital text aloud — useful on computers and tablets for students who can access digital content more easily than print.

Speech-to-text software: Dictation tools that allow students to compose written work verbally — beneficial for students with significant writing difficulties (dysgraphia) or motor challenges.

Adapted keyboards and mice: For students with fine motor difficulties affecting computer access.

Visual schedules and timers: Low-tech but high-impact AT for students with autism or executive function challenges who need predictability and time-awareness support.

Getting AT Written into the IEP

The IEP should specify for each AT tool:

1. The specific device or software (by name, not just "technology support")
2. Which subjects and settings it is used in
3. Who is responsible for ensuring access
4. Any training commitments for staff
5. How progress will be monitored (is the tool actually being used, and is it helping?)

If AT recommendations have been made by an OT, SLP, or specialist but never formalized in the IEP, they are not protected. A new teacher in September will not be bound by a hallway conversation from May.

For guidance on how to advocate for specific IEP accommodations — including assistive technology — and what to do when the school fails to provide promised AT supports, the Prince Edward Island IEP & Support Plan Blueprint includes specific strategies and documentation templates.

See more Canada guides →