Montana IEP Annual Review: What Must Happen and How to Prepare

The annual IEP review is the single most important meeting in your child's special education year. It is the moment when goals are updated, services are confirmed or changed, and placement is reviewed. For most Montana families, it is also the moment when districts announce reductions or changes with inadequate data and insufficient process.

Understanding what the law actually requires — and showing up prepared — changes the dynamic entirely.

What the Annual Review Must Accomplish

Under IDEA and Montana's ARM, the IEP team must meet at least annually to review the child's IEP and determine whether goals and services remain appropriate. The review is not simply a report card reading. It must include:

1. A review of progress toward current annual goals. The team must examine actual progress monitoring data for each IEP goal — not just teacher impressions, not a general narrative. Progress data should be specific, measurable, and collected systematically throughout the year.

2. A determination of whether goals have been achieved and whether new goals are needed. Goals that were mastered should be replaced with goals at the next developmental level. Goals that were not met should prompt analysis: Was the instruction appropriate? Was the goal calibrated correctly? What data supports continuing versus modifying the goal?

3. A review of whether present levels of academic achievement and functional performance (PLAAFP) are current. The PLAAFP section of the IEP must reflect the child's current functioning, not last year's evaluation data. If a child's reading level, behavioral baseline, or functional skills have changed, the PLAAFP must be updated before new goals are written.

4. A determination of whether the amount, frequency, location, and duration of services remains appropriate. This is where reductions are often proposed. Any change in services requires both a data-based justification and a Prior Written Notice before implementation.

5. A review of LRE placement. The team must confirm or reconsider where the child is being educated relative to nondisabled peers.

What You Should Request Before the Annual Review Meeting

Do not wait for the meeting to see the data. Under FERPA, you have the right to review all educational records before the meeting. Request them in writing at least five days before the scheduled review.

Specifically request:

• All progress monitoring data for each current IEP goal (graphed data, not just percentages or "making progress" narratives)
• The draft IEP goals proposed for the upcoming year
• Any evaluation data collected during the year
• The current PLAAFP section

If the district has not been collecting systematic progress monitoring data — which should be reported to parents at the same frequency as progress reports for general education students — that is a compliance issue worth documenting. Under ARM 10.16.3008, progress monitoring is required, not optional.

Preparing Your Own Written Parent Concerns

Before the meeting, write a document titled "Parent Concerns" that describes your observations of your child's functioning over the past year. Include:

• Areas where you've seen progress and areas where you're concerned about regression
• Services that appeared inconsistent, missed, or reduced without explanation
• Goals that seemed too easy (mastered quickly) or too difficult (rarely addressed)
• Behavioral or social observations that the school may not have data on
• Transitions, medical events, or family circumstances that affected the year

Under IDEA, parent concerns must be formally considered by the IEP team and integrated into the IEP document. Presenting written concerns — rather than raising them orally — ensures they are on the record.

When the District Proposes to Reduce Services

The annual review is a common moment for districts to propose service reductions. In Montana's small rural districts and cooperative-served schools, this often happens because itinerant staff availability has changed, a cooperative provider left mid-year, or the district claims the child has made enough progress to need fewer services.

Any proposal to reduce services constitutes a change in the provision of FAPE, and it requires a Prior Written Notice before implementation. The PWN must include the data supporting the proposed reduction, the alternatives considered, and why those alternatives were rejected.

If the district proposes a reduction verbally at the meeting without data to support it, ask these questions:

• "What specific progress monitoring data shows the current level of service is no longer necessary?"
• "Was this student's rate of progress consistent throughout the year, including after school breaks?"
• "What supplementary aids and services will replace the minutes being reduced?"
• "Can I have this reduction in writing before it takes effect, with a Prior Written Notice?"

If the district cannot answer those questions with data, the reduction is not supported by the individualized, data-based process IDEA requires.

The Annual Review and ESY Determination

The annual review is also the required occasion for the IEP team to determine whether Extended School Year (ESY) services are needed for the following summer. This determination cannot be deferred to a later meeting or handled informally.

Bring your regression/recoupment data to the annual review: what skills regressed over winter or spring break, and how long it took to recoup them. If the district's progress monitoring data doesn't show breaks clearly, bring your own observations and documentation. The ESY decision should be made at or before the annual review, and any denial requires a Prior Written Notice.

Recording the Meeting in Montana

Montana is a one-party consent state for recordings, but the relevant rule for IEP meetings is that one party must announce the recording openly. If you intend to record your annual review, announce it at the start of the meeting: "I want to let everyone know I'll be recording today's meeting to help me accurately recall the discussions."

Districts may attempt to cite internal policies against recordings. Federal guidance generally holds that if prohibiting recording would impede a parent's meaningful participation — for example, due to the complexity of the information discussed or a parental disability — the district must allow it. Announcing the recording openly also tends to improve the quality and accuracy of discussions.

After the Meeting: The Letter of Understanding

Within 24 to 48 hours of the annual review, send an email to the special education coordinator summarizing your understanding of key decisions made:

"To confirm my understanding of today's IEP meeting: the team agreed to [specific goal changes, service amounts, placement, ESY decision]. Please let me know in writing within 48 hours if my understanding is incorrect."

This simple practice converts verbal commitments into documented record. In small-town Montana districts where relationships are personal and informal, it also depersonalizes the record — the letter of understanding is about accuracy, not accusation.

If services are changed, reduced, or placement decisions are made at the annual review, ensure you receive a signed copy of the updated IEP and the required Prior Written Notice within a reasonable time. If the updated IEP has not arrived within two weeks of the meeting, follow up in writing.

The Montana IEP & 504 Advocacy Playbook includes a pre-meeting data request letter, a parent concerns document template, and a post-meeting letter of understanding template — all formatted for Montana's specific procedural requirements.

See more United States guides →