Colorado IEP Annual Review: What Must Happen and When

Once a year, the IEP team is required to meet and review your child's program. Most parents treat the annual IEP review as a rubber stamp — sign the new goals, take the copy, leave. But the annual review is actually one of the most important leverage points in the entire special education process. It's the meeting where last year's failures become documented problems and next year's services get locked in.

Here's what Colorado law requires to happen at the annual review, and how to use that meeting strategically.

The Legal Requirement: What "Annual" Means

Under IDEA and ECEA, the IEP must be reviewed and revised at least once a year. That means the meeting must occur no later than 12 months from the date the current IEP was implemented — not the date it was signed, and not the start of the school year. Each IEP has an anniversary date. If the district misses that date and allows the IEP to lapse, that's a procedural violation.

Lapsed IEPs are more common than parents realize, particularly in high-caseload districts and in rural BOCES where the special education coordinator manages dozens of students across multiple schools. If you believe your child's annual review is overdue, check the implementation date on the current IEP document and send a written request for the annual review meeting.

What the Annual Review Must Address

The annual IEP review is not just a goal update meeting. Under ECEA, the IEP team must:

Review progress on current goals. The team must present data — not impressions, not grades, but actual progress monitoring data — showing how the student performed on each annual goal over the past year. If data was not collected consistently, that's a failure the team must address.

Revise goals as appropriate. Goals that were mastered should be replaced with the next-level skills. Goals where the student made no progress should be examined: Was the baseline accurate? Was the instruction provided? Was the frequency adequate? No-progress goals require explanation and revision, not simple continuation.

Determine ESY eligibility. The annual review is the appropriate time to discuss and document the team's determination regarding Extended School Year services. If ESY is not discussed at the annual review, ask why, and request that the discussion be added to the agenda before you sign anything.

Review and revise placement. Placement is reviewed annually. If your child has been receiving services in a more restrictive setting and has made significant progress, the team should discuss whether a less restrictive placement is now appropriate. If your child has been in a setting that is insufficiently supportive and isn't making progress, the team should discuss more intensive options.

Review the PLAAFP. The Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance section must be updated to reflect current data. A PLAAFP that still describes the student as they were 12 months ago — without updating for the year's progress or regression — is not a legally compliant document.

Consider any new evaluations. If a reevaluation was conducted during the past year, or if new private evaluations or IEEs have been completed, the team must consider that information when revising the IEP.

Your Rights Before the Meeting

You have the right to request draft documents before the annual review — including the proposed draft IEP with new goals and the progress report. Request these in writing at least a week before the meeting. Reviewing the draft ahead of time lets you identify problems before you're in the room, gives you time to prepare questions, and prevents the meeting from being a presentation of completed decisions rather than a genuine collaborative process.

If the draft IEP was clearly completed before the meeting, without your input, and the team arrives with all decisions already made, that's predetermination — a procedural violation under IDEA. Meaningful parent participation requires that the team approach the meeting with an open mind, not a finished document.

What to Do When Goals Show No Progress

If the progress data at the annual review shows that your child made little or no progress on one or more goals during the year, ask the team to document in the IEP or the meeting notes:

1. What instruction was provided, and at what frequency
2. What data collection method was used
3. What barriers to progress were identified
4. What changes the team proposes to address the lack of progress

A goal that goes unmade three years in a row without any change to the instructional approach is a red flag. If the team cannot explain why progress didn't happen and what will be different next year, that's a conversation that may need to be escalated through a State Complaint or a request for an IEE.

If the Annual Review Is Missed

If the district fails to hold the annual review within 12 months of the IEP's implementation date, send a written request for the meeting immediately and document the original implementation date. A lapsed IEP is a compliance violation that can be filed as a State Complaint with the CDE. The violation is straightforward: the IEP anniversary date is in the document, the complaint date is knowable, and the failure to convene the meeting on time is a clear procedural breach.

In practice, many districts will hold the meeting quickly once you send a written request citing the anniversary date. The value of the State Complaint route is when the delay has been significant and services have been continuing under an expired plan without the team reviewing whether those services remain appropriate.

The Colorado IEP & 504 Advocacy Playbook includes an annual review preparation checklist, questions to bring to the meeting when goals show inadequate progress, and templates for requesting draft documents and compelling timely meetings. Get the full toolkit at /us/colorado/advocacy/.

See more United States guides →