Maryland Special Education Funding: How the System Is Financed and What It Means for Your Child

Maryland school districts receive federal and state funding specifically earmarked for special education — and understanding where that money comes from, how it is allocated, and what it can and cannot be used for directly affects your ability to push back when a district tells you it cannot afford the services your child needs.

"We don't have the budget for that" is not a legal defense under IDEA. Knowing the funding structure explains why.

The Three-Layer Funding Structure

Special education in Maryland is financed through three sources: federal IDEA grants, state formula funding, and local district revenues. Each layer has its own rules about how money can be used and what obligations it creates.

Federal IDEA Part B Funding

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act authorizes federal grants to states, which flow through to local education agencies. IDEA Part B funding covers students with disabilities aged 3 through 21. Maryland also receives IDEA Part C funding for the Infants and Toddlers Program (birth to age 3).

The federal IDEA allocation is based on a formula tied to child count and poverty data. For fiscal year purposes, Maryland receives tens of millions of dollars annually in Part B funds alone. These funds are distributed to Maryland's 24 LEAs and are intended to supplement — not replace — state and local special education spending.

Federal law prohibits "supplanting" — LEAs cannot use IDEA funds to replace spending they would otherwise make with local funds. IDEA money is supposed to expand the available resources for students with disabilities, not substitute for the basic education budget.

State Special Education Funding

Maryland uses a formula that provides additional per-pupil funding for students with disabilities through the Thornton Commission's adequacy formulas and subsequent updates under the Blueprint for Maryland's Future legislation. Students identified with disabilities generate higher per-pupil allocations than general education students.

The Blueprint for Maryland's Future, passed in 2021, significantly increased state education funding including special education components. This state-level investment was designed to reduce funding disparities between wealthy and low-wealth districts — though implementation takes years to fully materialize.

Local District Spending

The majority of special education costs in Maryland are funded locally. This is where the stark disparities between Maryland counties become financially concrete. Affluent counties like Montgomery, Howard, and Howard bring far larger local tax bases to special education than Baltimore City or rural Eastern Shore districts. This disparity is one reason why advocacy looks different in different parts of the state — it is a resource reality.

The Data: Who Is Served and at What Cost

During the 2022-2023 academic year, 111,386 Maryland students ages 3-21 received services under an IEP — 12.5% of total public school enrollment. These students are served across a wide range of placements: most in general education with supports, some in separate special education classrooms, and a smaller number in non-public schools.

The most expensive placements are non-public schools, which in Maryland can cost upward of $68,000 per student annually. Districts fund these placements when their own programs cannot provide FAPE, but because of the cost, they often resist them — sometimes improperly.

State complaint data from the MSDE Office of the Inspector General for Education shows consistent compliance failures concentrated in the highest-enrollment districts. In a recent reporting period, 583 formal complaints were filed statewide, with Prince George's County generating 93, Baltimore County 72, Baltimore City 62, Anne Arundel 54, and Montgomery County 49. The volume in larger districts reflects both higher student counts and more systemic compliance challenges.

What This Means for Your Advocacy

Understanding funding gives you the right framework for responding when a district cites budget as a barrier to services.

"We don't have the budget" is not a legal justification. Under IDEA and COMAR, the district's financial constraints cannot be used to deny services required for FAPE. A district that has received federal IDEA funds and state special education allocations cannot tell you that your child cannot receive speech therapy because funds are insufficient. If the service is required by the IEP, the district must provide it — period.

Staffing shortages do not eliminate the obligation. If a district cannot fill an OT or SLP position and your child's IEP requires those services, the district must contract with outside providers. If it fails to do so, the missed services may constitute a denial of FAPE and are compensable through compensatory education.

Proportionate share has limits. If you choose to enroll your child in a private school, the LEA's IDEA obligation is limited to a "proportionate share" of federal funds — not a full individual entitlement to FAPE. Services for parentally placed private school students are delivered through a Services Plan, not an IEP.

Request budget data when warranted. Under the Maryland Public Information Act (MPIA), parents and advocates can submit formal records requests to obtain district-level special education spending data, staffing reports, and resource allocation documents. This is especially useful when a district is claiming systemic resource constraints to deny placements or services — MPIA requests can reveal whether the district is adequately staffing and funding special education relative to its IDEA allocation.

State Complaint Data as an Advocacy Resource

Maryland's complaint data provides insight into where your district's compliance issues are concentrated. Prince George's County, Baltimore City, and Baltimore County — the districts with the highest complaint volumes — are also the districts where MSDE has exercised the most intensive monitoring and corrective action authority.

If your district is under an active MSDE Corrective Action Plan, that is relevant context for your advocacy. Districts under CAPs are often more responsive to formal written complaints and less likely to stonewall, because MSDE is already watching.

You can access MSDE monitoring reports and local district compliance data through the MSDE website and through MPIA requests to the state department.

What Funding Cannot Do

One thing IDEA funding cannot do is substitute for the legal obligation to provide FAPE. No matter how tight the local budget is, the following obligations remain:

• Conduct timely evaluations within Maryland's 60/90-day framework
• Provide services as written in the IEP
• Fund ESY services when required
• Fund non-public placements when no district program can provide FAPE
• Provide compensatory education for missed services

When a district is using budget language to deflect legitimate service requests, naming the relevant COMAR regulation and requesting Prior Written Notice is often enough to shift the conversation. The Maryland IEP & 504 Advocacy Playbook includes the scripts and regulatory citations you need to hold districts to their legal obligations regardless of what they claim about resources.

See more United States guides →