Italy Abolished Special Schools in 1977: What That Means for Your Child Today

When expat parents first encounter Italy's special education system, the most common initial reaction is confusion, followed shortly by either relief or alarm. Italy has no special schools. No resource rooms. No separate SEN units within mainstream schools. Every child — regardless of disability severity — attends a standard classroom with their neurotypical peers. This is not an accident or an oversight in policy. It is the result of a deliberate legislative revolution that happened nearly fifty years ago, and understanding why it happened explains everything about how the system operates today.

Why Italy Abolished Special Schools

Before the 1970s, Italy operated a segregated system similar to most of Europe. Children with disabilities were placed in special classes (classi differenziali) or specialized institutions, separated from mainstream education and society.

The movement against segregation gained force through the 1960s, driven by disability rights advocates, progressive educators, and a broader cultural reassessment of how Italian society treated its most vulnerable members. The argument was not only pedagogical but constitutional: Article 3 of the Italian Constitution guarantees equal social dignity and mandates the removal of obstacles that prevent citizens from full participation in society. Segregating children with disabilities in separate schools was, in this view, a violation of their constitutional rights.

Law 118/1971 began the transition, mandating that students with physical disabilities attend mainstream compulsory education where possible. The decisive break came with Law 517/1977, which formally abolished special schools and special differentiated classes, and required all students — including those with intellectual, sensory, and physical disabilities — to attend mainstream classrooms.

The 1977 law also introduced the foundational mechanism that makes inclusion possible: the insegnante di sostegno — a dedicated support teacher assigned to assist the class in integrating students with disabilities. This was not an aide assigned to shadow one child. It was a structural role within the class to support an inclusive environment for all students.

Italy has never reversed this. No subsequent government has reinstated special schools or special classes. The inclusion-first principle has survived forty years of political change, budget pressures, and documented implementation challenges.

The Scale of Inclusion Today

The philosophical commitment has produced large-scale integration. In the 2023-2024 academic year, nearly 359,000 students with certified disabilities attended Italian mainstream schools across all levels — 4.5% of the total student population. This represents a 26% increase over just five years, equivalent to 75,000 additional students.

Among this population, 40.3% have intellectual disabilities, 34.8% have psychological development disorders, and 17.5% have attention and behavioral disorders. These are not mild profiles — a significant portion of these students, approximately 28%, have substantial deficits in autonomy requiring assistance with communication, mobility, or personal care. They are all in mainstream classrooms.

For expat families arriving from the US or UK — where a student with severe autism might attend a specialist unit, or a student with Down syndrome might access a dedicated resource center — this represents a fundamentally different educational philosophy.

The ICF Framework and the Profilo di Funzionamento

The legal reforms of 2017 (D.Lgs. 66/2017) and 2019 (D.Lgs. 96/2019) modernized how students are assessed and supported within the inclusion model, shifting to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

The ICF framework is a conceptual shift from a purely medical model. Rather than categorizing students primarily by diagnosis or deficit, the ICF focuses on how a person functions within their specific environment, identifying both barriers and facilitators. A student's challenges are understood not just as internal deficits but as the interaction between their condition and the environment around them.

This philosophy is operationalized through the Profilo di Funzionamento (Functioning Profile) — a document that replaces the older PDF (Profilo Dinamico Funzionale) and the DIEF (Diagnosi Funzionale) that were used under the previous framework. The Profilo di Funzionamento is drafted by the ASL's multidisciplinary evaluation team and describes:

• The student's competencies and areas of difficulty, using ICF categories
• Environmental barriers present in the school context (physical, organizational, attitudinal)
• Environmental facilitators — things the school can put in place to support functioning
• The student's baseline for drafting the PEI

For expat parents, the Profilo di Funzionamento is the document that bridges the ASL medical process and the school's PEI drafting. It is not a diagnostic label — it is a functional description of how the child operates in their educational environment. When you participate in the GLO meeting to draft the PEI, the Profilo di Funzionamento is the reference point the team works from.

What Inclusion Looks Like in Practice

Understanding the philosophy doesn't mean the practical reality is simple. Italy's inclusion model has documented strengths and documented weaknesses.

The national support teacher ratio is favorable — approximately 1.4 students per support teacher in state schools. But 27% of those support teachers lack specialized SEN training, having been placed in the role through the general supply teacher system without specific qualifications. Teacher turnover is severe: 57.3% of students with disabilities start each September with a new support teacher, disrupting the continuity of support.

Regional disparities are significant. Northern Italian schools have better infrastructure and technology but more acute staffing shortages — 38% of support teachers in the North lack specialization, and assignment delays are more common. Southern schools have better staffing continuity and more specialized teachers, but greater infrastructure failures: over 53% of schools in the South report unmet demand for adapted technology, and only 37% of adapted computer stations in regions like Puglia are located within classrooms (most are in separate computer labs, physically separating students from their peers).

The inclusion model works best when the support teacher and class teachers function as a genuine team, when the PEI goals are specific and measurable, and when parents actively participate in the GLO process to shape and monitor the plan. When any of these elements are absent, the "inclusion" can become nominal — a student physically present in the mainstream class but not meaningfully participating.

What This Means for Expat Families

The absence of specialist settings creates both opportunity and challenge. The opportunity is genuine: Italy's inclusion model, when it functions well, produces real social integration and developmentally appropriate experiences that specialist segregated settings often cannot. Research on Italy's long-term outcomes for students with disabilities is cited internationally by inclusion advocates.

The challenge is that the system places a heavy burden on parents to be active, informed participants in the GLO process. There is no separate "special education department" to liaise with, no IEP coordinator handling things independently. The mainstream class council, the support teacher, the ASL specialists, and the family all share responsibility for making inclusion work. Families who understand their rights, prepare carefully for GLO meetings, and know how to advocate for a robust PEI get significantly better outcomes than those who don't.

The Italy Special Education Blueprint provides the practical tools for that advocacy: a full explanation of the ICF-based Profilo di Funzionamento, the GLO meeting preparation guide, and the complete legal framework — so you can engage with Italy's inclusion model as an informed participant, not a bewildered observer.

See more Italy guides →