LSA Hours in ACT Schools: How Learning Support Assistant Funding Actually Works

The most common source of conflict between ACT parents and schools isn't about policy — it's about hours. Specifically, Learning Support Assistant (LSA) hours: how many your child is allocated, who decides, and what you can do when the school says there aren't enough.

If you've been told your child "doesn't qualify" for an aide, or that their hours are being reduced, or that the school has used up its LSA allocation, this post explains how the funding system actually works and where you have leverage.

What LSAs Do and Why They Matter

A Learning Support Assistant (sometimes called an Integration Aide in other states) is a school employee who provides direct, in-classroom support to students with disability. Depending on the student's needs, an LSA might help with curriculum access, personal care, communication support, behavioral management, or physical assistance.

For many students with moderate-to-significant needs, LSA hours are not a nice-to-have — they are the practical mechanism by which reasonable adjustments are actually delivered. An ILP that mandates a visual schedule, structured transitions, and a sensory break protocol means little if there is no LSA present to facilitate those supports.

This is why the allocation — or reduction — of LSA hours is often the sharpest flashpoint in ACT disability education disputes.

The Two Funding Streams That Determine LSA Hours

Understanding where LSA hours come from requires understanding two overlapping frameworks: the national NCCD and the ACT-specific Student Disability Criteria (ACT SDC).

1. The NCCD (Nationally Consistent Collection of Data)

Every Australian school is required under the Australian Education Regulations 2023 to report NCCD data annually. This national data set categorizes students into four levels of adjustment based on the intensity of support they require:

• QDTP (Quality Differentiated Teaching Practice): adjustments delivered through standard good teaching — no aide required
• Supplementary: additional, targeted support beyond normal classroom practice
• Substantial: significant, highly individualized support that substantially differs from standard curriculum delivery
• Extensive: constant, intensive, highly individualized support

School funding under the federal funding model is partially driven by NCCD data. Nationally, only 2.5% of students receive Extensive adjustments — the category most likely to correspond to significant LSA allocation. The majority of adjustments fall in the QDTP and Supplementary bands, where aide support may be intermittent or shared.

2. The ACT Student Disability Criteria (ACT SDC)

On top of the national NCCD framework, the ACT Education Directorate operates its own resourcing mechanism: the ACT Student Disability Criteria (ACT SDC). This is the territory-level gatekeeping framework that determines eligibility for centralized Directorate-funded supports — including specific, ongoing LSA allocations.

The ACT SDC has historically created a gap: a student may clearly require support under the NCCD framework, but fail to meet the more stringent ACT SDC criteria to unlock dedicated Directorate funding. This is a documented systemic flaw. The Auditor-General's 2023 report explicitly noted this discrepancy and its impact on student outcomes.

The ACT's 2024–2034 Inclusive Education Strategy commits to developing a new, transparent needs-based resourcing model to replace the older SDC-based approach — but this transition is still in progress. For now, many parents find their child caught between these two frameworks.

The Role of the SCAN Process

The Student Centred Appraisal of Need (SCAN) is the ACT's formal moderation process that directly determines how centralized resources, including LSA hours, are allocated. The SCAN evaluates students across ten domains in two dimensions:

• Access (what the student needs just to physically access the school environment): communication, mobility, personal care, safety
• Participation (what the student needs to engage in the educational program): social development, curriculum participation, communication supports, behaviour, literacy and numeracy

The SCAN meeting brings together parents, school staff, and a trained Directorate moderator. The output — a descriptor grouping across each domain — determines the student's resourcing band. Higher descriptor groupings reflect a sustained need for more intensive support and unlock greater centralized resources, including LSA hours.

This is why the SCAN process matters so much. If the meeting produces descriptor groupings that underestimate your child's actual needs, the resulting LSA allocation will be insufficient. Many parents discover this mismatch only after support hours prove inadequate in practice.

If you believe the SCAN assessment underrepresented your child's needs, you have the right to formally appeal the outcome — particularly if you can demonstrate that the ILP goals are failing to be achieved because the allocated support is insufficient.

What Schools Can and Cannot Decide Unilaterally

Schools have some discretion in how they deploy the LSA hours they receive through centralized allocation. However, there are limits.

If an LSA allocation has been determined through the SCAN process and confirmed in the ILP, the school cannot unilaterally reduce those hours without triggering a formal ILP review. Changes to agreed-upon support levels require a meeting, parental consultation, and documentation in the ILP.

Under the DSE 2005, reasonable adjustments cannot be removed without adequate process. If your child's LSA hours have been cut without an ILP review or your knowledge, this is a procedural breach worth raising in writing with the principal and, if necessary, with the ACT Education Directorate.

Schools also cannot use a temporary staffing gap — such as an LSA being absent with no replacement — as an indefinite reduction in your child's support. Occasional operational disruption is unavoidable, but if LSA coverage is consistently absent, that is a systemic failure to deliver agreed adjustments.

What to Do When Hours Are Insufficient or Denied

If your child has no current SCAN assessment: Request one in writing through the school's disability support coordinator or principal. Frame the request around specific, documented functional impacts — the concrete things your child cannot access or participate in without additional support.

If a SCAN has been completed but you believe the outcome undervalues your child's needs: Gather current evidence from allied health providers, document specific incidents where insufficient support has led to curriculum exclusion or behavioral crisis, and request a formal review or appeal. An updated assessment from a private psychologist or occupational therapist strengthens your case significantly.

If LSA hours have been cut without process: Send a written request for documentation of the decision, ask which ILP review meeting authorized the change, and request an urgent ILP review if none occurred.

If the school says there is simply no LSA funding available: This is where the DSE 2005 framework matters. Resourcing limitations at the school level do not override the legal obligation to provide reasonable adjustments. Ask the school whether they are formally claiming unjustifiable hardship — and if so, to provide that claim in writing with supporting evidence.

The Australian Capital Territory Disability Support Blueprint includes detailed guidance on how to prepare for SCAN meetings and what to document when LSA hours are reduced or denied — including the specific email language that forces schools to formalize what would otherwise stay as a verbal dismissal.

The Bigger Picture

Nationally, 25.7% of students received educational adjustments in 2024 under NCCD — up from 18.0% in 2015. The ACT's own strategy acknowledges that resourcing has not kept pace with this growth. That doesn't make the situation acceptable; it makes the paper trail and formal escalation process even more important.

LSA hours are not discretionary gifts. For students whose ILPs document the need for them, they are part of a legally mandated reasonable adjustment. Treat any reduction or denial as a compliance issue, document it accordingly, and be prepared to escalate through the formal channels if the school cannot substantiate its position.

See more Australia guides →