West Virginia IEP Goal Bank: Policy 2419-Compliant Goal Examples

Walking into a West Virginia IEP meeting with a draft list of proposed goals changes the entire dynamic. Instead of reacting to whatever the school has written, you arrive with specific, legally compliant language that demonstrates you understand Policy 2419's requirements. Here is what those goals need to look like — and examples you can adapt.

What Makes a Goal Policy 2419-Compliant

West Virginia Policy 2419 is explicit: every annual goal in an IEP must contain five specific components to be considered measurable and legally sound. A goal missing any of these elements is technically non-compliant:

1. Timeframe — The date by which the goal should be achieved ("By June 2027...")
2. Condition — The specific circumstances under which the student will perform the behavior ("Given a third-grade passage and graphic organizer...")
3. Student's Name — Named explicitly in the goal ("...Marcus will...")
4. Behavior — An observable, specific action ("...identify the main idea and three supporting details...")
5. Criterion — The performance level required to demonstrate mastery ("...with 85% accuracy across four consecutive data trials")

Goals must also be "appropriately ambitious" — meaning they should reflect genuine, challenging growth, not minimal expectations designed to make progress easy to document.

Common problems in West Virginia IEPs: vague behaviors ("will improve reading skills"), missing criteria ("will identify main ideas with teacher support"), and generic timeframes without specific target dates. All are contestable.

Academic Goal Examples

Reading Comprehension (Elementary): By May 2027, given a second-grade reading passage and verbal prompting, Sofia will answer five literal comprehension questions with 80% accuracy across five consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by teacher-administered probes.

Reading Fluency: By May 2027, given a first-grade reading passage, Marcus will read aloud at a rate of at least 50 words per minute with no more than three errors, as measured by weekly curriculum-based fluency probes across four consecutive weeks.

Written Expression: By May 2027, given a picture prompt and a graphic organizer, Lily will write a three-sentence paragraph that includes a topic sentence, one supporting detail, and a closing sentence, with correct capitalization and end punctuation, with 75% accuracy across four of five writing samples.

Math — Computation (Middle School): By June 2027, given 20 multi-digit multiplication problems (three digits by two digits), Devon will accurately solve at least 17 of 20 problems independently, as measured by monthly probe assessments.

Math — Problem Solving: By June 2027, given a two-step word problem with visual supports, Amara will correctly identify the operation needed and solve the problem with 80% accuracy across three consecutive weekly probes.

Autism-Specific Goal Examples

Social Communication: By May 2027, during structured classroom activities, when a peer initiates a greeting or question, Ethan will respond verbally or with an AAC device within 5 seconds with a contextually appropriate response on 8 of 10 observed opportunities across three consecutive weeks, as measured by teacher data logs.

Initiating Peer Interaction: By May 2027, during unstructured break periods, Jordan will independently initiate a social interaction with a peer (asking a question, offering an object, or joining an activity) on at least 4 of 5 observed opportunities during weekly observations across three consecutive weeks.

Tolerating Transitions: By June 2027, given a two-minute transition warning and a visual schedule, Noah will transition between classroom activities without physical refusal or aggression in 9 of 10 observed transitions across four consecutive weeks, as measured by paraprofessional data logs.

Functional Communication (AAC): By May 2027, given a preferred item held out of reach, Mia will use her AAC device to make a three-word request ("I want [item]") independently, without physical prompting, on 4 of 5 opportunities across three consecutive weeks.

Behavior and Emotional Regulation Goals

Self-Regulation (Elementary): By May 2027, when presented with a frustrating task, given access to the classroom calm-down corner and a visual feelings chart, Caleb will independently identify his emotional state and use one coping strategy (deep breathing, counting, or squeeze ball) in 4 of 5 observed incidents across four consecutive weeks, as measured by the classroom teacher's behavior log.

On-Task Behavior: By June 2027, during a 20-minute independent work period, Jade will remain on task (defined as eyes on work, materials in use, no off-task vocalizations) for a minimum of 15 continuous minutes on 4 of 5 observed sessions per week across three consecutive weeks, as measured by interval recording.

Speech-Language Goal Examples

Articulation: By May 2027, during structured naming activities, when presented with picture cards containing the /r/ sound, Lucas will produce the /r/ sound correctly in the initial position of words with 90% accuracy across three consecutive 10-minute probe sessions, as measured by the speech-language pathologist.

Language — Following Directions: By May 2027, during classroom instruction, given two-step oral directions, Priya will comply with both steps in sequence without repetition on 8 of 10 trials across four consecutive weeks, as measured by teacher observation records.

Progress Monitoring in West Virginia

Policy 2419 requires each IEP to include a statement of how the child's progress toward annual goals will be measured and when parents will be notified. Progress reports must be sent to parents at the same frequency as standard report cards.

A good progress monitoring plan specifies:

• What data will be collected (probes, running records, behavior logs, work samples)
• How often (weekly, biweekly, monthly)
• Who is responsible for collecting it (special education teacher, speech therapist, paraprofessional)
• What performance level indicates the student is on track versus not on track

If the IEP simply says "teacher observation" as the progress monitoring method, that is insufficient. Observation without structured data collection is not measurable. Request specificity.

If progress reports show inadequate growth — "some progress" notations without data — at the annual review, the team is required to address why goals were not met and adjust the program accordingly. Persistent lack of progress despite appropriate instruction can indicate that the IEP itself needs to be more intensive.

The West Virginia IEP & 504 Blueprint includes a full goal-writing template aligned to Policy 2419's five-component requirement, with additional examples across disability categories and guidance on evaluating progress data at annual reviews. Get the complete toolkit.

See more United States homeschool guides →