Vermont IEP Progress Monitoring: How to Track Whether Your Child's Goals Are Being Met

Progress monitoring is the accountability mechanism of the IEP system. An IEP without robust progress tracking is a legal document that no one can enforce — because without data, you can't show whether a child is making progress, stagnating, or regressing. Vermont parents who know how to read and use progress data are in a completely different position than those who wait for a report card.

What Vermont Law Requires

Vermont Rule 2360 requires that the IEP specify:

• When periodic reports on the child's progress toward annual goals will be provided to parents
• How progress will be measured for each goal

Most Vermont districts provide progress reports concurrent with standard report cards — typically quarterly. That's the minimum the law contemplates. You can request more frequent reporting. If your child is working on a critical skill that you need to monitor closely, put monthly data review into the IEP itself.

The progress report must describe where the child currently stands relative to the annual goal — not just whether they're "making progress" (too vague) but actual data showing movement toward the measurable target specified in the goal.

Reading a Progress Report

When a progress report arrives, check these things:

Is there actual data? The report should include numbers, percentages, or frequency counts — not just narrative descriptions. "Johnny is working hard on his reading goals" is not data. "Johnny is reading at 62 words per minute on grade-level text; the goal is 90 words per minute by June" is data.

Is the student on track to meet the goal? Compare the current performance to the goal and the timeline. If it's November and the goal is to reach 90 wpm by June and the student is at 62 wpm, is the rate of improvement sufficient to get there in seven months? A simple linear calculation tells you whether the trajectory is adequate.

Is progress being measured the way the IEP specifies? If the IEP says the goal will be measured by weekly curriculum-based reading probes, the progress report should reflect probe data — not teacher observation or informal impression.

If progress is inadequate, is there a response? Vermont Rule 2360 requires that when a progress review indicates a child is not making satisfactory progress toward annual goals, the IEP team must convene to revise the IEP. This is not optional — it is a legal requirement. If progress reports show quarter after quarter of insufficient progress and no IEP meeting has been called, that's a violation you can document and report.

Building Your Own Progress Monitoring System

Don't rely entirely on the school's quarterly reports. Simple systems parents can maintain:

For reading: Ask the teacher for a weekly oral reading fluency probe result — one minute, one passage, words read correctly. Track the number over time. A chart of 20 data points tells you exactly whether the trajectory is toward the goal or away from it.

For behavior goals: Use a simple daily tally. How many times did the replacement behavior occur vs. the problem behavior? Even a rough count tracked over four weeks shows patterns.

For communication goals: Note specific instances of functional communication — device activations, verbal requests, multi-word phrases. A brief log kept over two weeks is more informative than a quarterly narrative.

For assignment completion: A simple weekly tracker: how many assignments were assigned, how many were submitted on time, how many were completed. This directly corresponds to many executive functioning goals.

When you bring data to an IEP meeting, the conversation changes. "My data shows Johnny has submitted 12 of 40 assignments since October" is hard to dismiss.

When Progress Isn't Happening

If progress reports or your own tracking show that a child is not making meaningful progress toward IEP goals, you have several options:

Request an IEP meeting. Vermont Rule 2360 requires one when progress is insufficient. Put the request in writing. State the specific goals where progress is lacking and reference the data.

Request an explanation of what services have been delivered. Before concluding that the intervention isn't working, confirm that the intervention is actually happening as written. Service logs — which show what sessions were held, by whom, and for how long — are educational records you have the right to access. If the OT sessions stopped because a staff member left and weren't replaced, the IEP hasn't been implemented, which is a separate violation.

Request a new or updated evaluation. If a child has received consistent, well-implemented intervention and hasn't made progress, that itself is diagnostic information. A reevaluation can determine whether the current goals and services are appropriate or whether the child's needs have changed.

Consider whether compensatory education is warranted. If the lack of progress stems from the school's failure to implement services — missed sessions, unqualified staff, services not provided as specified — you may have grounds for a compensatory education claim for the services that should have been delivered.

IEP Progress Monitoring Templates

When building your own tracking system, a simple template for each goal works well:

Track this for every goal, every data collection period. When you arrive at an IEP meeting with a completed table for six months, the team is working with your data — not just theirs.

Vermont's Quarterly Report Card Timing

Vermont's progress reports are typically tied to the report card schedule, which varies by district. Ask at the start of the year: exactly when will progress reports be sent, and what format will they take? If the format is a checkbox that just says "making adequate progress / not making adequate progress," push back. That tells you nothing actionable. Request that progress reports include actual data and current performance levels for each goal.

The Act 173 Connection

Under Vermont's census-based Act 173 funding, some districts have reduced staffing for special education services. Progress monitoring data is one of your clearest tools for documenting the real-world impact of service reductions. If your child's goals aren't being met and the service logs show sessions were missed because of staffing shortages, that documentation supports a claim that the district failed to implement the IEP — and it grounds any request for compensatory services in evidence.

The Vermont IEP & 504 Blueprint includes progress tracking worksheets designed for Vermont's IEP goal structure, covering the six areas Vermont measures for adverse effect and building in the quarterly review timelines specified in Vermont Rule 2360.

See more United States homeschool guides →