Surrey SD36 Special Education: What the EA Cuts Mean for Your Child

If you have a child with special needs in Surrey School District (SD36), you've likely felt the impact of what's happening in this district right now. Surrey is BC's largest and fastest-growing school district, and it's facing a special education crisis that has made national news. EA positions have been eliminated, resource teacher caseloads have expanded to untenable levels, and families are being told their children will receive less support than the previous school year — sometimes with only a few days' notice.

This post explains what's actually happening, what the law requires, and what you can do if your child's support has been cut.

The Surrey Special Education Crisis in Numbers

Surrey SD36 needed to find $16 million to balance its 2025/2026 budget. One of the consequences was the elimination of 50 education assistant positions. Fifty. For the district already under severe pressure to support students with complex needs, this cut represents a significant reduction in frontline support capacity.

The numbers tell the story of what this means on the ground. Before the cuts, Surrey was operating at approximately 1.8 Level 1-3 designated students per EA — already tight. After the position eliminations, the ratios worsened further. Union representatives have publicly stated that EAs are being forced to triage support, managing multiple high-needs children simultaneously rather than providing the one-to-one or small-group support those children's IEPs contemplate.

In parallel, Surrey relies on approximately 400 portables — equivalent to 16 schools — creating fragmented, inconsistent environments that compound the challenges for students who need routine and stability.

The outcome for many families: children are being sent home early. "Modified schedules" are being imposed without consent. EA hours that were formally documented in IEPs are being reduced without explanation. And parents are receiving calls at work to come pick up children who are described as "dysregulated" because there isn't enough support in the building.

What Surrey SD36 Is Legally Required to Do

Budget cuts change what the district can afford to do. They do not change what the district is legally required to do.

Under the BC Human Rights Code, school districts have an absolute duty to accommodate students with disabilities up to the point of undue hardship. The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed in Moore v. British Columbia (2012) that financial constraints do not relieve a school district of this duty — and that the district must demonstrate it exhaustively evaluated alternatives before denying accommodations.

A district-wide budget shortfall, however severe, does not satisfy the undue hardship standard for an individual child's accommodation. To meet that standard for a specific student, the district would need to demonstrate that providing the documented accommodation to that child would fundamentally imperil the district's overall financial viability. "We cut 50 EAs" is a policy decision, not an individualized undue hardship analysis.

This matters because it determines where you direct your energy. Arguing with a principal about the district's budget is unlikely to move anything. Formally documenting the gap between your child's assessed needs and what's being delivered, and explicitly invoking the duty to accommodate in writing, shifts the conversation onto legal ground where the district's obligations are clearer.

If Your Child's EA Hours Have Been Cut

When EA hours are reduced — whether announced at the start of the year or imposed mid-year — treat it as a formal decision that triggers formal rights.

Request the rationale in writing. Email the principal requesting a written explanation of why the hours are being reduced and what assessment of your child's functional needs was conducted before the decision was made. A decision to reduce accommodations should be based on your child's needs, not the district's staffing situation.

Request a School-Based Team meeting. Formally request that the IEP be revisited. The current IEP documents your child's assessed needs. If the district can no longer meet those needs, the IEP meeting is the venue to document the gap and discuss alternatives.

Document every incident. When your child is sent home early, when an EA doesn't show up, when programming is reduced — document it with dates and details. Send a follow-up email to the principal confirming what occurred. "To confirm our conversation this morning: [child's name] was sent home at 10:30 a.m. because there was no EA available. This is the third occurrence this month." That pattern of documented incidents is the evidence base for any formal complaint.

Do not accept verbal modifications to the IEP. If a school is telling you verbally that your child's EA hours are being reduced from 20 hours per week to 8, that modification must be reflected in writing and — if it represents a reduction in services — you have the right to contest it through a formal IEP meeting.

Section 11 Appeals: The 30-Day Window

If the district has made a formal decision to reduce your child's EA support and you want to formally contest it, the Section 11 appeal under the BC School Act allows you to challenge decisions that "significantly affect the education, health or safety of a student."

The critical detail: most Surrey district appeals must be filed within 30 days of being informed of the decision. If your child's reduced EA hours were communicated at the start of the school year and you're now several months in, that clock may have passed. Don't wait — if you intend to appeal, start the process immediately.

A Section 11 appeal goes to the Board of Education. It doesn't automatically restore services, but completing it is a procedural prerequisite before escalating to external bodies like the BC Ombudsperson or the BC Human Rights Tribunal.

Escalating to the District Level

Before reaching the appeal stage, escalate in writing to SD36's Director of Inclusive Education at the district office. Not just the principal — the district administrator responsible for inclusive education funding and policy. Name the specific reduction in services, cite your child's documented needs, and explicitly reference the duty to accommodate under the BC Human Rights Code.

District-level administrators have more authority than principals to reallocate resources. And a written request that cites specific legal obligations is harder to ignore than a concerned email asking "what's going on."

For Surrey parents navigating EA cuts or informal exclusions right now, the British Columbia Special Ed Advocacy Playbook includes BC-specific letter templates for EA hour reduction disputes, IEP modification challenges, and escalation to district administration — including language calibrated to the Human Rights Code and the Moore precedent.

See more Canada guides →