SEN Code of Practice Northern Ireland: The Three-Stage Framework Explained

Northern Ireland's SEN system is governed by a legal framework that is distinct from the rest of the UK. While England updated its statutory framework in 2014 through the Children and Families Act, Northern Ireland operates under the Education (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, the Special Educational Needs and Disability (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 (SENDO), and — most recently — the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (Northern Ireland) 2016. The SEN Code of Practice is the statutory guidance that tells schools, the Education Authority (EA), and health trusts how to implement this legislation in practice.

Understanding the Code matters because it defines the thresholds, timescales, and responsibilities at each stage. It also sets out the legally significant language — what the EA is required to do versus what it merely should do.

From Five Stages to Three

The original 1998 SEN Code of Practice for Northern Ireland used a five-stage model. The Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 provides for a new three-stage framework, but the supporting Regulations and new Code of Practice are not yet fully operational. The transition is still in progress, so the three-stage model is a developing framework rather than the current operative legal framework.

Stage 1: School-Led Special Educational Provision. Under the proposed framework, the school would be led by a Learning Support Coordinator (LSC), identify the child's needs, and put in place provision funded from the school's own delegated budget. The child is placed on the SEN register. A Personal Learning Plan (PLP) is intended to replace the older Individual Education Plan (IEP), but that requirement has not yet commenced, although schools are encouraged to use PLPs. The school monitors progress. This is the school-based stage before external EA support is involved.

Stage 2: School and EA Support. Under the proposed framework, Stage 2 begins when Stage 1 provision has not been sufficient and external support is needed. The EA's Local Impact Teams (LITs) — multidisciplinary specialist staff — may be deployed. Health and Social Care Trust professionals may become involved. Under the proposed framework, the child would continue to have a PLP. A child moves to Stage 2 only once external provision is actively in place, and remains at Stage 2 while any statutory assessment is being carried out.

Stage 3: Statutory Assessment and Statement. Under the proposed framework, if Stage 2 provision has been exhausted and the child continues to have needs that cannot be met through delegated school resources, the EA may initiate a formal statutory assessment. If the assessment concludes that a Statement is required, it is issued at Stage 3. From this point, the EA bears direct legal responsibility to arrange the provision specified in Part 3 of the Statement.

What the Code Requires at Each Stage

The Code sets mandatory language in several places that parents should know.

On provision, the Code states that special educational provision should "normally be specific, detailed and quantified." This applies most critically to Part 3 of a Statement. The EA frequently drafts Statements using vague language — "access to support," "opportunities for intervention" — which falls short of the level of specificity the Code says provision should normally have. The landmark case Re C, McD and McG confirmed that vague Statements not specifying provision appropriate to identified needs do not comply with the law.

On assessment thresholds, the Code provides that the EA should only agree to conduct a statutory assessment where a child has "learning difficulties that appear significant" and where relevant and purposeful action has been taken at the school-based stages without adequate progress. This is the threshold parents must demonstrate when making a parental request for assessment — and it is the threshold the EA applies when deciding whether to refuse.

On timescales, the current statutory framework requires: Notice of Consideration within 10 days, a decision on whether to assess within six weeks, and a final Statement within 26 weeks of the original request. These are statutory duties, not targets.

Where the Code Fails Parents in Practice

The Code is designed to describe how the system should operate ideally. In practice, the NIAO found that 85% of Statements were issued outside the 26-week statutory limit in 2019–20. The EA's own EA Connect portal and Request for Involvement (RFI) process have added bureaucratic layers that slow referrals at Stage 2. The Children's Law Centre has explicitly noted that recent "transformation" initiatives have increased administrative burden on schools making EA referrals.

The Code also provides little practical guidance on what parents should do when the system does not operate as it should. It explains the structure without providing the adversarial tools parents need to navigate it.

Using the Code in Your Own Submissions

When writing to the EA, referencing the correct Code of Practice provisions carries weight. If the EA is delaying beyond its statutory timescales, cite the specific regulation. If the proposed Statement contains vague Part 3 wording, reference the Code's requirement for specification and quantification. If the EA is refusing to assess, reference the criteria the Code sets for when assessment should be initiated.

For detailed guidance on how to reference the Code strategically in EA correspondence, challenge vague Statement wording, and hold the EA to its statutory timescales, the Northern Ireland SEN Statement Blueprint provides NI-specific letter templates and a step-by-step breakdown of the process.

See more Northern Ireland guides →