Placing Request Refused in Scotland: How to Appeal

Applications to the Additional Support Needs Tribunal concerning placing requests have risen by two-thirds since the pandemic — from 146 applications in 2019/20 to 244 in 2023/24. In 2023, when the Tribunal held placing-request tribunals and came to a decision, it found in favour of the parent or young person in 16 of 22 cases. Those figures are worth holding onto if your placing request has just been refused.

A placing request allows a parent or, where applicable, a young person to request that a child be educated at a school other than the one the education authority would ordinarily place them in. This includes requests to move from one mainstream school to another, requests to a local authority special school, and requests to independent or grant-aided special schools. The authority can refuse — but only on specific statutory grounds.

The Grounds on Which a Placing Request Can Be Refused

For a child with ASN, Schedule 2 of the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 governs the placing request. The authority can refuse if one or more of the following applies:

• The requested school is unsuitable for the child's age, ability, or aptitude
• Placing the child there would be incompatible with the provision of efficient education for other children
• Placing the child there would involve unreasonable public expenditure
• The authority offers adequate alternative provision for the child at another school

One commonly cited ground is unreasonable public expenditure. Authorities argue that the cost of placing a child in a specialist independent school, or funding the transport required to reach a requested school, is unreasonable relative to available resources.

This argument is weaker than it sounds. "Unreasonable public expenditure" must be assessed under the applicable statutory test and against what is required to educate the child properly. Budget pressure alone does not settle whether a refusal is lawful; evidence about the child's needs, the requested placement, and any adequate alternative provision remains relevant.

Why Special School Placing Requests Are Common Ground for Disputes

The standard position of most Scottish local authorities is that nearly all ASN pupils can be educated in mainstream school, supported by the presumption of mainstreaming under the Standards in Scotland's Schools etc. Act 2000. Section 15 of that Act requires education in a mainstream setting unless specific exceptions apply: the child's ability or aptitude is incompatible with mainstreaming, it would be incompatible with the education of other children, or it would require unreasonable public expenditure.

In practice, many children with complex needs are placed in mainstream settings where the necessary specialist support simply does not exist. When parents apply for a specialist placement — at a local authority ASN unit, a grant-aided school like Corseford, or an independent school — the authority frequently refuses on cost grounds, arguing that with "appropriate support" the mainstream school can meet the child's needs.

The question you need to answer, with evidence, is whether the mainstream school has ever actually met your child's needs. If your child has been excluded repeatedly, has regressed academically, is in persistent distress at school, or has had NHS professionals recommend a specialist environment, you have evidence that the mainstream placement is failing. That evidence can support a case under the applicable statutory grounds and appeal route.

How to Challenge a Refused Placing Request

When an education authority refuses a placing request, they must write to you explaining the decision and the grounds for refusal. The appeal route depends on the request and the child's CSP status: a refused special-school request, or a mainstream request where the child has a CSP, can go to the Additional Support Needs Tribunal, usually within two months of the disputed decision. Other refusals go to the education authority's appeal committee and, where applicable, the sheriff.

If the ASN Tribunal route applies, do not let the two-month deadline pass in the hope that informal discussions will resolve the issue. Lodge the reference and negotiate simultaneously. The existence of a pending Tribunal reference changes the authority's incentives significantly.

Your Tribunal case should:

Address each stated ground for refusal directly. If the authority says the requested school would require unreasonable additional expenditure, your evidence should demonstrate what the current mainstream placement is actually costing in terms of support, exclusions, alternative provision, and ongoing failures — compared with what the specialist placement would cost. Often the gap is smaller than the authority implies.

Show the failure of the current placement. Reports from NHS professionals, clinical psychologists, occupational therapists, or speech and language therapists that document ongoing unmet needs and recommend a different environment are highly persuasive. If your own professionals are recommending the specialist placement, that recommendation carries significant weight.

Demonstrate that the requested school is appropriate. Evidence from the requested school — its admissions process, any assessment they have carried out, correspondence confirming they have a suitable place and provision — strengthens the case that the placement would actually work.

Link clinical evidence to educational impact. Any professional report you rely on must connect the clinical findings to educational consequences. A report that diagnoses autism and recommends a specialist school must explain why the specialist environment is educationally necessary, not just therapeutically preferable.

Getting Independent Evidence

Education authorities rely heavily on their in-house Educational Psychologists. If the EP's report supports the mainstream placement, you need independent evidence to challenge it. An independent educational psychology assessment — typically several hundred pounds privately — can fundamentally change the weight of evidence at a Tribunal.

If your child holds a Co-ordinated Support Plan, the CSP process is also relevant. A CSP can itself be appealed if the content specifies an inadequate placement. If your child does not hold a CSP, you may have parallel grounds for requesting one while also pursuing the placing request appeal.

What the Tribunal Can Order

If the Tribunal has jurisdiction and finds in your favour on a placing request, it orders the education authority to place your child in the requested school. This is a binding order. The authority is legally obliged to implement it.

The Tribunal cannot force an independent school to accept a child — the place must be available. An authority has the power to provide transport for a placing request but no statutory duty to do so, so address transport separately with evidence.

Our Scotland ASN Appeals Playbook includes a step-by-step guide to building a placing request Tribunal case, a checklist of the evidence types most persuasive to the Health and Education Chamber panel, and template documents for initial placing request submissions.

The Statistics Are in Your Favour

When the Tribunal holds a hearing on a contested placing request and comes to a decision on the merits, the record shows that the parent or young person won in 16 of 22 held cases in 2023. Many more cases are resolved before the hearing, once authorities see that a parent has built a proper evidence file. The process is demanding, but the record shows it can work when pursued with preparation. The cost of specialist legal representation is the biggest barrier — which is why knowing the process, the evidence requirements, and the statutory grounds is so valuable.

See more Scotland guides →