Pennsylvania IEP for Dyslexia: Getting the Right Services and Goals
Dyslexia is the most common learning disability, affecting an estimated 15-20% of the population. In Pennsylvania, 36.7% of students in special education are classified under Specific Learning Disability — the category that includes dyslexia. Yet many families spend years navigating reading interventions, general support programs, and 504 accommodations before anyone raises the possibility that their child may need an IEP with specially designed reading instruction.
If your child has dyslexia and is not making meaningful progress, here's how to navigate Pennsylvania's system.
Dyslexia and Pennsylvania Special Education Eligibility
To qualify for an IEP under Chapter 14, a student must:
- Have a disability recognized under one of the 13 IDEA categories
- Require specially designed instruction as a result of that disability
Dyslexia falls under the Specific Learning Disability (SLD) category. To qualify under SLD, the evaluation must identify a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or using language, which manifests as significant difficulties in reading, writing, or math.
The critical question the evaluation must answer is not just whether the student has dyslexia, but whether the dyslexia means they require instruction that is designed specifically for their disability — structured literacy, Orton-Gillingham-based approaches, multisensory techniques — that differs from what would be provided to a typical student. If a student needs that kind of specialized instruction to make progress, they qualify for an IEP.
What to Request in the Evaluation
The school's evaluation under Chapter 14 must be comprehensive and must not rely on any single measure. For a dyslexia evaluation, an appropriate comprehensive assessment should include:
Phonological processing measures. Tests like the CTOPP-2 assess phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming — the core processing deficits underlying most dyslexia. Without these measures, the evaluation is incomplete.
Reading component assessments. Measures of oral reading fluency, reading accuracy, reading comprehension, and decoding of nonsense words (to isolate the phonics component from context guessing).
Cognitive processing assessments. A psychoeducational evaluation that assesses processing speed, working memory, and verbal reasoning in addition to academic achievement.
Writing assessments. Because dyslexia frequently co-occurs with dysgraphia, assessing written expression separately is important.
If the school's evaluation lacks these elements, you have the right to disagree with the evaluation and request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense. The district must either fund the IEE or file for due process to defend their own evaluation.
What the IEP Should Include
An IEP for a student with dyslexia is not appropriately served by providing extended time and a quieter testing environment. Those are accommodations — appropriate for a 504 plan. An IEP must include specially designed instruction that addresses the underlying deficit.
Structured literacy instruction. The research base is unambiguous that students with dyslexia need explicit, systematic, sequential phonics instruction. Programs like Orton-Gillingham, Wilson Reading System, SPIRE, or RAVE-O are evidence-based approaches. The IEP should specify the instructional methodology, not just list "reading instruction" as a service.
Measurable goals that track the right skills. IEP goals for students with dyslexia should target phonological awareness, decoding accuracy, reading fluency (words correct per minute), and spelling — not just reading comprehension, which can mask underlying deficits through context strategies. Pennsylvania's PaTTAN-compliant goal format requires a Condition, the student's Name, a specific observable Behavior, and measurable Criteria.
Example of a compliant goal: "Given a 2nd-grade decodable text, Marcus will read aloud with 95% accuracy at 90 words per minute on 3 out of 4 consecutive weekly progress monitoring probes."
Service frequency and duration. The IEP should specify how many minutes per week of specialized reading instruction the student receives and in what setting. For a student with significant dyslexia, this is typically daily intensive small-group instruction, not once-a-week support.
Assistive technology. Text-to-speech software, audiobooks, and speech-to-text tools support a student's access to grade-level content while the underlying reading skills are being built. The IEP should specify which tools will be provided and how staff will support their use.
Free Download
Get the Pennsylvania Dispute Letter Starter Kit
Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.
The MTSS/RTII Delay Problem
Pennsylvania schools frequently place students with suspected dyslexia in Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS/RTII) interventions before evaluating them. These tiered interventions can be valuable, but they cannot be used to delay or deny a special education evaluation if a disability is suspected.
Federal and Pennsylvania state law explicitly prohibit LEAs from using MTSS participation as a justification to withhold evaluation. If your child has been in intervention for a year or more without making adequate progress, and the school is still telling you to "wait and see," you have the right to request a formal evaluation in writing. The request starts the 60-calendar-day evaluation clock.
Progress Monitoring: The Accountability Tool
Once an IEP is in place, progress monitoring data is the evidence base for whether the IEP is working. For reading goals, this should be frequent — ideally weekly or bi-weekly — using standardized measures like AIMSweb, DIBELS, or easyCBM.
If your child's progress monitoring data shows flat growth or regression over multiple reporting periods, that is documented evidence that the IEP is not providing a meaningful educational benefit. At that point, you have grounds to request an IEP team meeting to revise the goals and services — and if the district refuses, grounds for a state complaint or due process complaint.
The Pennsylvania IEP & 504 Advocacy Playbook includes evaluation request letters, IEP goal quality checklists, and step-by-step guidance for parents challenging inadequate reading programs. Get the complete toolkit at /us/pennsylvania/advocacy/.
Get Your Free Pennsylvania Dispute Letter Starter Kit
Download the Pennsylvania Dispute Letter Starter Kit — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.