The Evaluation Report in Pennsylvania Special Education: What It Is and How to Use It

Before a child in Pennsylvania can receive special education services, the school must complete an evaluation and produce a specific document: the Evaluation Report, commonly called the ER. This is not just paperwork. The ER is the legal foundation of everything that follows — eligibility determination, IEP development, and service decisions. A weak or inaccurate ER can result in a child receiving no services, or in services that are mismatched with the child's actual needs. Understanding what the ER must contain, and what to do when it falls short, is one of the most important skills a Pennsylvania parent can develop.

What the Evaluation Report Is

Pennsylvania requires a strict separation between evaluation data and program planning that does not exist in all states. The Evaluation Report (ER) is a standalone document that synthesizes all evaluation findings. Its sole purpose is to determine eligibility and describe the student's educational needs. It is not the IEP. It is not the 504 plan. It is the evidence base that the IEP team uses when they later develop the educational program.

A complete Pennsylvania ER must address:

• The student's educational history and current academic performance
• Results of all assessments conducted — cognitive, academic achievement, behavioral, social-emotional, and any domain-specific evaluations (speech and language, occupational therapy, adaptive behavior, etc.)
• Observations of the student in the educational setting
• A summary of parental input
• A statement of the student's educational needs identified by the data
• An eligibility determination: does the student meet the criteria for one or more of Pennsylvania's recognized disability categories?
• If the student is eligible: does the disability require Specially Designed Instruction (SDI)?

The final two items are the most consequential. A student can have a confirmed clinical diagnosis — ADHD, dyslexia, anxiety — and the ER can still conclude that the student is not eligible for an IEP under Chapter 14. Eligibility for an IEP requires both a qualifying disability category AND a documented need for specially designed instruction. If the evaluators conclude that the student can access the curriculum through accommodations alone, the ER may recommend a 504 plan under Chapter 15 rather than an IEP.

What You Are Entitled to Before the IEP Meeting

Pennsylvania law requires the district to provide you with a copy of the completed ER at least 10 school days before the IEP meeting. This is a mandatory review period, not a courtesy. Its purpose is to give you sufficient time to read the findings, consult with outside professionals if needed, and arrive at the meeting as a meaningful participant rather than someone learning results in real time.

You have the right to waive this 10-school-day period in writing if you want to move faster. But you should only do this deliberately, not because the school schedules the IEP meeting immediately after the ER and presents the waiver as a formality.

When you receive the ER, read it before anything else. The IEP meeting will be built entirely on what this document says. If the ER contains errors — incorrect test scores, misquoted observations, missing domains, or eligibility conclusions that do not follow from the data — those errors will carry forward into the IEP unless you challenge them.

How to Evaluate an ER for Completeness

You do not need to be a psychologist to identify gaps in an ER. Ask these questions:

Were all relevant areas evaluated? If your child has suspected dyslexia, was phonological processing tested? If you raised concerns about executive functioning, was a behavioral rating scale administered? If your child has motor difficulties, was occupational therapy included? An ER that only covers cognitive ability and academic achievement without addressing the specific areas of concern you raised may be incomplete.

Do the conclusions follow from the data? Sometimes evaluators report test scores that indicate significant impairment, then reach a conclusion that the student does not need specially designed instruction. Look at whether the eligibility determination is logically supported by the numbers in the report.

Is your parental input reflected? The ER must include a summary of information provided by the parents. If you submitted written concerns or participated in interviews and none of that appears in the report, the ER is procedurally deficient.

Are needs identified, not just categories? The ER should not just check eligibility boxes. It should describe the specific educational needs that the IEP must then address. If the report identifies the category but provides only vague descriptions of what the student struggles with, the resulting IEP will likely have equally vague goals.

What to Do If You Disagree with the ER

If you believe the school's Evaluation Report is inaccurate or incomplete, Pennsylvania law gives you a specific remedy: the right to request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense.

When you request an IEE, the district has two choices:

1. Agree to fund an independent evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner you select (within the district's established criteria for qualifications and cost)
2. File for due process immediately to defend the appropriateness of its own ER

The district cannot simply ignore the request or delay indefinitely. If the district files for due process to defend its evaluation and loses, it must fund the IEE anyway. If the district funds the IEE, it must consider the results — though it is not required to agree with them — at any subsequent IEP meeting.

An IEE at public expense is a powerful tool, but it works best when it is specific. Rather than a blanket objection to the ER, identify which components you dispute and what additional assessments you believe are needed. A targeted request is harder for the district to challenge in due process than a general expression of dissatisfaction.

The ER and the NOREP

After the ER is issued and eligibility is determined, the district will also issue a NOREP (Notice of Recommended Educational Placement) documenting the eligibility finding and the district's proposed educational response. If the district has found the student ineligible for an IEP, the NOREP documents that decision.

The NOREP must include an explanation of the alternatives considered and the reasons for the district's decision. If a NOREP determines ineligibility with only a brief notation rather than a full explanation, you have grounds to request a corrected NOREP that meets the statutory requirements for content.

The Pennsylvania IEP & 504 Blueprint walks through how to read an Evaluation Report, identify gaps, and structure an IEE request — along with the specific timelines and forms that govern the process from evaluation request through IEP implementation.

After the ER: The IEP Meeting Timeline

Once the ER is delivered and eligibility is established, the IEP team must convene within 30 calendar days to develop the Individualized Education Program. The ER forms the data foundation for the IEP's Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) section — the baseline from which all annual goals are written.

If the PLAAFP is vague or does not reflect what the ER actually found, the resulting goals will be equally weak. Parents who have read and understood the ER before the IEP meeting are positioned to ensure that the PLAAFP accurately represents what the data shows — and that the goals are sufficiently specific and ambitious to reflect the Endrew F. standard that the U.S. Supreme Court established in 2017: an IEP must be reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances, not merely a minimal or de minimis benefit.

The ER is the document where you have the most leverage before any binding decisions are made. Use it.

See more United States guides →