School Suspension in Nunavut: When Your Child's Disability Is Being Punished
School Suspension in Nunavut: When Your Child's Disability Is Being Punished
A call from the school saying your child has been suspended again is one of the most exhausting, helpless-feeling moments a parent can experience. When it happens repeatedly — when the same child is sent home over and over for behaviors that are directly connected to a disability that the school has not adequately addressed — it stops being a disciplinary issue and starts being a legal one.
In Nunavut, the law is clear that schools have an obligation to accommodate disability-related behavior, not punish it. Chronic suspension of a child with a disability who is not receiving adequate support may constitute discrimination under the Nunavut Human Rights Act.
Why This Pattern Happens
Schools use suspension as a behavioral intervention tool. For most students, suspension serves its intended purpose — temporary removal from the school environment signals consequence and disrupts a problematic behavioral pattern.
For students whose behavior is rooted in an unaccommodated disability, suspension is counterproductive and often harmful:
- A child with ADHD whose impulsivity and inability to regulate attention is mistaken for deliberate defiance will not learn self-regulation from being sent home. The school is simply relieved of having to manage the child for another day.
- A child with FASD whose emotional dysregulation escalates under sensory overload or schedule unpredictability will continue to dysregulate when they return to the same unmodified environment.
- A child with autism who enters a physical altercation during an unmanaged transition period — because no SSA was present and the transition was not scaffolded — is being punished for the school's failure to implement a behavioral support plan.
The behavioral incident is the visible symptom. The unaccommodated disability is the root cause. Suspension addresses neither.
What the Law Requires
The Nunavut Education Act establishes inclusive education as a mandatory statutory obligation. A school cannot simply remove a student from the educational environment because managing that student is difficult. The legal baseline is that the school must develop supports — documented in the ISSP — to enable the student to participate in the educational environment.
The Nunavut Human Rights Act adds a further layer: the duty to accommodate disability up to the point of undue hardship. A school that repeatedly excludes a student for disability-related behavior without implementing meaningful accommodations is likely not meeting the duty to accommodate. The relevant question is not "was the behavior a problem" but "did the school take reasonable steps to prevent the behavior through appropriate accommodation?"
Undue hardship — the threshold at which accommodation is not required — is a high bar. Courts and tribunals have consistently found that staffing inconvenience, budget concerns, or the disruption caused by a difficult student are not themselves undue hardship. The threshold requires genuine evidence of safety risk that cannot be managed with reasonable accommodation, or costs that are so disproportionate as to be systemically unsustainable.
Functional Behavioral Assessment: The Tool Schools Should Be Using
Before resorting to suspension as a behavioral management strategy, best practice — and the direction the Inuglugijaittuq framework supports — is a Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA).
An FBA is a structured process that identifies:
- What specific behaviors are occurring (precisely defined, not vague)
- What antecedents trigger the behavior (what happens immediately before)
- What consequences maintain the behavior (what the child gets or avoids by engaging in it)
- What function the behavior serves for the child
Understanding the function of behavior is essential to designing effective intervention. A child who hits other students during unstructured time may be doing so to escape overwhelming sensory environments. A child who destroys materials during academic instruction may be avoiding tasks that are too difficult or too easy. Addressing these root causes — through environmental modification, sensory support, or task adjustment — is far more effective than punitive responses.
Parents can formally request an FBA for their child through the school team. The FBA should be conducted by someone with behavioral assessment training — ideally the Student Support Teacher (SST) or an itinerant behavioral consultant. The results of the FBA should directly inform updates to the ISSP, creating a Behavioral Support Plan that proactively addresses the conditions that trigger behavioral incidents.
If your child is being suspended repeatedly and no FBA has been conducted, request one in writing. Cite the specific behaviors that are triggering suspensions and ask what assessment process is informing the school's response.
Free Download
Get the Nunavut Dispute Letter Starter Kit
Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.
Documenting Suspensions and Exclusions
Keep a written record of every suspension and exclusion — formal and informal. "Informal exclusion" includes being sent to the principal's office for extended periods, being asked to wait at home because the school "can't manage" the child today, or being placed in an unsupervised space away from the classroom.
For each incident, record:
- Date and duration of the exclusion
- What behavior triggered it (specifically what happened, not the school's characterization)
- Whether an ISSP-specified support was in place at the time (was an SSA present? was the transition scaffolded?)
- What communication you received from the school
- Whether a formal suspension letter was issued
Formal suspensions should always be accompanied by written documentation identifying the reason, the duration, and any conditions for return. If they are not, ask for this documentation in writing.
This record serves two purposes: it documents a pattern for any formal complaint, and it helps you identify whether specific support failures (absent SSA, missed transition support) are consistently preceding the behavioral incidents.
The Immediate Escalation Path
If your child is being suspended more than two or three times in a term for the same type of behavior, escalate in writing without waiting for the pattern to worsen:
1. Send a written letter to the principal requesting an emergency school team meeting to review the behavioral incidents, identify the root causes, and update the ISSP with a formal Behavioral Support Plan. State clearly that you believe the current supports are inadequate and that the behavioral incidents are connected to the school's failure to implement appropriate accommodations.
2. Request a Functional Behavioral Assessment as part of the ISSP review. Put this in writing.
3. If the school does not respond or the suspensions continue, escalate to the DEA and RSO in writing. Include your documentation of the pattern.
4. File a complaint with the Nunavut Human Rights Tribunal if the pattern represents sustained exclusion or punitive treatment connected to a disability. Contact the Tribunal at [email protected] or toll-free 1-866-413-6478. This step is reserved for cases where the educational system has clearly failed to address a sustained, documented pattern — but it is available, and the Tribunal has broad remedial authority including ordering specific accommodations and training.
Keeping Your Child's Relationship With School Intact
This is a sensitive balance, particularly in small communities. In Rankin Inlet or Gjoa Haven, aggressive confrontation with the school — even a justified one — damages relationships that your family depends on for years. The principal is still going to be at the Northern Store. The teacher is still going to be at community events.
The most effective approach is to be specifically focused on behaviors and systems, not on individuals. "The current behavioral support plan is not preventing these incidents — I'd like to discuss what additional supports can be put in place" is a more productive opening than "the school is failing my child." The goal is a revised ISSP that prevents the next suspension, not a victory over the administrator.
The Nunavut Special Ed Advocacy Playbook includes a Behavioral Support Plan request letter, a suspension documentation log, and the specific language needed to request an FBA and ISSP review — framed for the collaborative, relationship-preserving approach that works best in Nunavut's community context.
Get Your Free Nunavut Dispute Letter Starter Kit
Download the Nunavut Dispute Letter Starter Kit — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.