NJ Private School Tuition Reimbursement: Unilateral Placement and the Burlington-Carter Test

Some New Jersey parents reach a point where they have tried everything — multiple IEP meetings, mediation, state complaints — and the district still will not provide their child with an appropriate program. At that point, some families make a unilateral decision: they pull their child from the district and enroll them in a private school at their own expense, intending to seek tuition reimbursement later through due process. This is one of the highest-stakes moves available to a special education parent in New Jersey. When done correctly, it can result in full reimbursement for private school tuition. When done incorrectly, the family absorbs the entire cost.

Understanding the legal framework — and specifically the Burlington-Carter test — is not optional before you take this step.

What the Burlington-Carter Test Requires

The right to tuition reimbursement for unilateral private school placement comes from two U.S. Supreme Court cases: School Committee of Burlington v. Department of Education (1985) and Florence County School District Four v. Carter (1993). Together they establish the three-part standard — often called the Burlington-Carter test — that New Jersey courts and the Office of Administrative Law use to determine whether reimbursement is warranted:

1. The district's IEP was inappropriate. The parent must prove that the IEP the district proposed — the placement or the services — did not offer a Free Appropriate Public Education under IDEA standards.

2. The private school the parent chose is appropriate. The parent must prove that the private school provides special education services that are appropriate for the child's needs, even if the school does not meet every state standard for public schools.

3. Equitable factors favor reimbursement. Even if the first two elements are met, the court or ALJ considers whether the parent acted in good faith — giving the district proper notice, not withholding the child's records, and not refusing to cooperate with the IEP process.

All three elements must be satisfied. Failing any one of them can result in denial of reimbursement, even if the private school was genuinely better for the child.

The APSSD System: The District's Preferred Alternative

Before reaching the point of unilateral placement, many New Jersey families are offered placement in an NJDOE Approved Private School for Students with Disabilities (APSSD). APSSDs are private schools that have received NJDOE approval to serve students with disabilities and are paid for entirely by the sending district through a tuition arrangement.

There are important distinctions between an APSSD placement offered by the district and a unilateral private school placement sought by the parent:

When the district places your child in an APSSD, the district is responsible for paying tuition, providing transportation, and maintaining IEP oversight. The placement is consensual and part of the IEP. You are not seeking reimbursement — the district is funding the placement.

When you make a unilateral placement in a private school, you are paying tuition out of pocket and seeking reimbursement through due process. The school may or may not be an APSSD. The Burlington-Carter test applies.

If the district is offering an APSSD placement but you believe a different private school is more appropriate for your child, you face a more complicated path to reimbursement — because the district can argue their APSSD offer constituted an appropriate FAPE, and the question becomes whether the Burlington-Carter first element is satisfied.

Notice Requirements Before Unilateral Placement

The IDEA imposes notice requirements on parents who plan to make a unilateral placement. Under 20 U.S.C. §1412(a)(10)(C), a parent must do one of the following before removing the child and placing them in a private school:

• Provide written notice to the district at the most recent IEP meeting, stating their concerns and their intent to enroll the child in a private school at public expense; or
• Provide written notice to the district at least ten business days before removing the child from the district program.

Failure to provide adequate notice does not automatically bar reimbursement, but it gives the ALJ or court discretion to reduce or deny it as an equitable matter. To protect your right to full reimbursement, provide written notice via certified mail.

What "Appropriate" Means for the Private School

The private school you choose does not have to meet every state certification or licensing standard that applies to public schools. The Carter decision specifically held that parents cannot be denied reimbursement simply because the private school does not employ state-certified special education teachers or follow every state curriculum standard.

What the private school must do is provide special education programming that is reasonably calculated to provide educational benefit for the child. In practice, this means:

• Individualized instruction addressing the student's documented areas of need
• Qualified staff with appropriate training for the student's disability profile
• A structured, evidence-based approach to the specific learning, behavioral, or communication goals in the student's prior IEP

If the private school you choose is already an NJDOE-approved APSSD, meeting the "appropriate" standard is typically straightforward. If it is a non-approved private school, you will need to document why its program is appropriate — usually through an expert evaluation or expert testimony in due process.

Jointure Commissions as an Alternative to Pure Private Placement

For families who need intensive services but want to remain in the public system, New Jersey's jointure commissions offer an intermediate option. Jointure commissions are formal shared-services entities that operate special education programs across multiple member school districts. They provide public programs — typically serving students with moderate to significant needs — funded through a combination of district tuition and county resources.

Unlike APSSDs, jointure commissions are public programs. They do not involve the Burlington-Carter tuition reimbursement framework. If the IEP team recommends a jointure commission program and you consent, the district pays the jointure's tuition directly. If the district declines to refer your child to a jointure program you believe is appropriate, this becomes part of the standard IEP dispute process.

The Due Process Path for Tuition Reimbursement

If you have made a unilateral private placement and the district refuses to reimburse you, due process is the primary enforcement mechanism in New Jersey. Due process petitions are filed with the NJDOE Office of Special Education and heard by an Administrative Law Judge at the Office of Administrative Law.

New Jersey is widely considered one of the most litigious states for special education due process. The district bears the burden of proof — it must demonstrate that its IEP offered a FAPE — which incentivizes districts to retain experienced special education attorneys and fight reimbursement claims aggressively. The average special education attorney in New Jersey charges approximately $348 per hour, making this litigation expensive for both sides.

Before initiating due process, consider whether NJDOE mediation might resolve the tuition dispute. Mediation agreements are legally binding and can result in partial or full reimbursement without the cost and time of a full due process hearing. Given that only 36 of 853 due process complaints filed in the 2022-2023 school year in New Jersey were resolved within the legal timeline, resolving the dispute through mediation often results in a faster outcome than waiting for an ALJ.

The New Jersey IEP & 504 Advocacy Playbook covers the Burlington-Carter notice requirements, the evidence you need to build a reimbursement claim, and the mediation process for tuition disputes.

See more United States guides →