$0 NT Dispute Letter Starter Kit

Behaviour Support Plans in NT Schools: What They Must Include and How to Demand One

When a student's behaviour is causing problems in an NT school, the default response is often disciplinary: detentions, time-outs, reduced timetables, suspensions. When that student has a disability and the behaviour is connected to it, the disciplinary approach is not just ineffective — it may be unlawful. The legally appropriate response is a Behaviour Support Plan.

Here's what a proper BSP involves in the NT, why schools avoid creating them, and how to demand one.

What Is a Behaviour Support Plan?

A Behaviour Support Plan (BSP), also called a Positive Behaviour Support Plan (PBSP) in NT documentation, is a formal document that:

  1. Identifies the specific behaviours of concern (what they look like, when they occur, how often, how severe)
  2. Analyses the function of the behaviour — what the student is communicating or trying to achieve through that behaviour (avoiding a task? seeking sensory input? escaping social interaction? responding to pain?)
  3. Identifies the triggers and setting conditions that make the behaviour more likely
  4. Specifies proactive strategies — environmental modifications and teaching of alternative skills that reduce the likelihood of the behaviour occurring
  5. Specifies responsive strategies — what staff should do when the behaviour occurs, replacing punitive responses with supportive ones
  6. Sets measurable goals and review dates

A BSP is not a list of punishments. It is not a behaviour contract that puts the compliance responsibility on the student. It is a plan that changes the environment and the adult responses to meet the student's needs.

When Is a BSP Required?

In the NT, a BSP is required when a student with disability exhibits behaviour that:

  • Is causing concern for the student's safety or the safety of others
  • Is leading to exclusion, suspension, or reduced timetable
  • Is a recognised presentation of the student's disability (sensory meltdowns, impulsive responses, anxiety-driven avoidance)
  • Has not responded to general classroom management strategies

The Disability Standards for Education 2005 requires schools to provide reasonable adjustments based on the student's needs. For a student whose primary challenge is behaviour linked to disability, a BSP is the primary reasonable adjustment. The school's failure to develop one — and instead relying on disciplinary responses alone — is a failure to provide reasonable adjustments.

Under the Education Act 2015 (NT) and NT suspension guidelines, principals must consider whether reasonable adjustments were in place before suspending a student with disability. A school that is suspending a student without a BSP in place is creating a record of its own non-compliance with that requirement.

Requesting a BSP: The Formal Approach

Don't wait for the school to suggest it. Request a BSP in writing after any suspension, exclusion, or series of behavioural incidents.

Write to the principal stating:

  • Your child has [diagnosis], and recent behavioural incidents (describe them briefly) are consistent with presentations related to their disability
  • You are formally requesting the school conduct a Functional Behaviour Assessment (FBA) and develop a Behaviour Support Plan as a reasonable adjustment under the DSE 2005
  • You request the FBA be conducted by a qualified behaviour support practitioner and that you be involved in the development of the BSP
  • Set a 14-day deadline for a response confirming the referral

A Functional Behaviour Assessment (FBA) is the diagnostic process that informs the BSP — it's the investigation that answers "why is this behaviour occurring?" The NT Department of Education's SWI team includes behaviour support specialists who can conduct FBAs. For remote schools, this may require a visit from an itinerant specialist or a telehealth assessment process.

Free Download

Get the NT Dispute Letter Starter Kit

Everything in this article as a printable checklist — plus action plans and reference guides you can start using today.

The Difference Between a Real BSP and a Compliance Exercise

A genuine BSP changes things. It results in teachers understanding what's driving the behaviour, adjustments being made to reduce triggers, and alternative skill-building being explicitly taught. Progress is measured.

A compliance BSP is a document the school produces to satisfy the parent, containing vague strategies that nobody implements. Signs of a compliance BSP:

  • Strategies are described at a level of generality that requires no change in teacher behaviour ("staff will respond calmly")
  • No one is named as responsible for implementation
  • There are no review dates or measurable goals
  • The document is never referred to again in practice

When you receive a BSP, review it against these indicators. If it's a compliance document, send written feedback requesting specific revisions: named responsible staff, measurable implementation milestones, review date within six weeks.

Incorporating the BSP Into the EAP

A BSP that exists separately from the EAP can be quietly ignored. The BSP must be formally incorporated into the EAP — attached as an annex — and uploaded to the Student Achievement Information System (SAIS). When a new teacher arrives next term, the BSP should be part of what they read on day one, not a document that has to be located and forwarded manually.

After the BSP is developed, send a follow-up email to the principal confirming that it has been incorporated into the EAP and uploaded to SAIS. Get written confirmation.

If the School Refuses to Develop a BSP

A refusal to develop a BSP for a student whose disability-related behaviour is leading to exclusionary discipline is grounds for a formal complaint under the NT Department of Education's Level 1 complaint process. Frame the complaint around:

  • The specific incidents where the student was suspended or excluded
  • The school's failure to develop a BSP prior to or following those incidents
  • The legal obligation under the DSE 2005 to provide reasonable adjustments for disability-related behaviour
  • The requirement under NT suspension guidelines that reasonable adjustments be in place before suspensions are enacted

If the Level 1 complaint doesn't result in action, escalate to Level 2 (Regional Director) and, if necessary, to the NT Anti-Discrimination Commission.

The Northern Territory Disability Advocacy Playbook includes the formal BSP request letter, the FBA referral demand, and the checklist for evaluating whether a school has produced a genuine Behaviour Support Plan or a compliance document.

Get Your Free NT Dispute Letter Starter Kit

Download the NT Dispute Letter Starter Kit — a printable guide with checklists, scripts, and action plans you can start using today.

Learn More →