Assistive Technology in Alabama IEPs: What Parents Need to Know

Your child's school provided a tablet last year — then took it back at the end of the school day. A speech therapist mentioned that a communication device might help but nothing materialized. The IEP meeting came and went with no mention of assistive technology at all.

Alabama law requires IEP teams to consider assistive technology for every child with a disability. That consideration is not optional, and it is not the same as saying no.

What Counts as Assistive Technology Under IDEA

Assistive technology (AT) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act includes any item, piece of equipment, or product system — whether commercially purchased, modified, or customized — that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of a child with a disability.

This is a deliberately broad definition. AT is not limited to expensive devices. It includes:

• Low-tech AT: pencil grips, slant boards, highlighter tape, picture communication boards, fidget tools
• Mid-tech AT: audiobooks, voice recorders, talking calculators, simple step-by-step communicators
• High-tech AT: text-to-speech software, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices, screen readers, speech-to-text programs, adapted keyboards, and eye-gaze technology

AT services — meaning the evaluation, training, and technical assistance to use devices effectively — are also required. Providing a device without training is a common gap that undercuts its benefit.

Alabama's Mandatory AT Consideration

Alabama's Special Education Tracking System (SETS) includes a "Special Instructional Factors" checklist on the Profile Page of every IEP. One of the required checklist items is whether the student requires assistive technology devices and services.

The IEP team must check yes or no to this question and, if the answer is no, document why. This is a legal compliance requirement under AAC 290-8-9. If your child's IEP has never mentioned assistive technology — not even to decline it — that is a gap worth raising.

The consideration standard is not the same as approval. "We considered it and determined it is not needed" is a legally defensible position if it is backed by data. "We never discussed it" is not.

How to Request an AT Evaluation

If you believe your child needs assistive technology that the IEP team has not addressed, submit a written request for an AT evaluation before the next IEP meeting. Address it to the special education director or the IEP case manager.

Your request does not need to be elaborate. It should state:

• Your child's name and current IEP
• Your concern: that your child's disability is limiting access to the curriculum in specific, documented ways (reading independently, producing written work, participating in class discussions, etc.)
• Your request: a comprehensive assistive technology evaluation to identify devices and services that may help

Alabama must obtain your informed written consent before conducting any evaluation. Once consent is received, the 60-calendar-day evaluation clock begins. The AT evaluation should be conducted by someone with expertise in assistive technology — often a district AT specialist, an occupational therapist with AT training, or a contracted AT evaluator.

What the AT Evaluation Includes

A thorough AT evaluation looks at the student, the environment, and the task. The commonly used SETT (Student, Environment, Tasks, Tools) framework organizes this:

• Student: What are the student's current abilities and challenges? What can they do with and without support?
• Environment: Where does the student need to perform? Classroom, hallway, cafeteria, home?
• Tasks: What specific academic or functional tasks are they struggling with that AT might address?
• Tools: Based on the first three, what tools (AT devices or services) should be trialed?

Evaluation includes direct observation, trial use of potential devices, and review of prior assessment data. It should produce a written report with specific recommendations, including which tools to trial, for how long, and how to measure whether they are working.

When Schools Say No

Schools can deny AT for a child whose IEP team determines, based on evaluation data, that AT is not required for the student to receive FAPE. That is a legal position.

What schools cannot do:

• Refuse to even consider AT without documented rationale
• Deny AT based on cost alone
• Deny an AT evaluation when a parent has made a written request
• Provide AT at school but refuse to allow the student to take it home if home use is required for the student to benefit from their education

On that last point: if a student requires an AT device to complete homework independently or to practice skills outside of school, the district may be required to allow the device to go home. This is a common dispute in Alabama districts, where schools often treat devices as school property that stays in the building. IDEA is clear that if home use is educationally necessary, cost is not a legal barrier to allowing it.

When AT is denied, the school must issue a Prior Written Notice (PWN) documenting the refusal, the reasons, and the alternatives considered. Request this in writing before leaving the IEP meeting.

AT in the SETS Paperwork

If AT is approved, it appears in two places on the SETS IEP:

1. The Special Instructional Factors checklist (yes, AT is needed)
2. The supplementary aids and services section, listing the specific device or service, the frequency of use, and the provider

Ask to see both sections of the draft IEP to confirm the AT is properly documented. Verbal promises made during an IEP meeting that do not appear in the written SETS document are not legally binding.

Also confirm that the AT is listed on the "Persons Responsible for IEP Implementation" form — so the specific staff member responsible for ensuring the device is available, charged, and used correctly is identified by name.

Getting the Right AT Into the IEP

AT is one of the most under-requested and under-documented components of Alabama IEPs. Parents often do not know to ask for it, and schools often do not volunteer it.

The Alabama IEP & 504 Blueprint walks through the SETS Special Instructional Factors checklist in plain language, includes a parent checklist for evaluating AT recommendations, and explains how to escalate an AT denial through the state complaint process. If your child's disability is creating barriers that the right tools could remove, this is where to start.

See more United States guides →